ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019
Removal of Cu(II) from wastewater by using mechanochemically activated carbonate-based tailings through chemical precipitation.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meeting the UN Sustainable Development Goals with Mechanochemistry.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This work explored the feasibility of utilizing the copper tailings (CT) for removing copper from the waste mine water based on the mechanochemical activation. Batch experiments were performed to evaluate the influences of various experimental parameters like the dosage of CT, reaction time, initial concentration of Cu, and anion species. By cogriding copper solution with CT in the stirred mill (mechanochemical activation), over 99.5% of copper was removed and the residual copper concentration in the solution was less than 0.5 mg/L, reaching the discharge limit. This reaction was a chemical precipitation process. The calcite of CT played a major role in precipitating copper and had a better removal effect on copper in the copper sulfate solution than copper nitrate solution. For copper sulfate solution, the copper deposit was mainly posnjakite (Cu
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.