Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31696407›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2019

Surgery for Metastatic Melanoma: an Evolving Concept.

Alessandro A E Testori, Stephanie A Blankenstein, Alexander C J van Akkooi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandro A E TestoriDermatology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, v.le Golgi 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy. info@alessandrotestori.it.
Stephanie A BlankensteinDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Alexander C J van AkkooiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review describes the evolving role of surgery in stage III and IV melanoma. RECENT

findingsSurgery has been the first option to cure melanoma patients at initial diagnosis of metastatic spread: a complete surgical excision of the disease either in stage III or IV has been the gold standard for decades. A positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been followed by a complete lymph node dissection (CLND) since the early stages of modern surgical oncology. However, since two randomized trials have indicated that a CLND does not improve survival in patients with a positive SNB, a CLND is no longer considered mandatory. A therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) is still offered to patients with macroscopic nodal disease and in highly selected cases, patients with distant melanoma metastases can be treated surgically as well. Also the availability of adjuvant, and in the future possibly neoadjuvant, systemic therapy have shifted the landscape to less extensive surgery in metastatic melanoma. With the development of new systemic options, surgery in metastatic melanoma has become more and more part of a multidisciplinary treatment: surgical indications are moving from previous standards to a new role.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMelanomaNeoplasm StagingSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyLymph node dissectionMelanoma surgerySentinel node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID31696407
OpenAlexW2985568083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.