ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2019
[Facets of moral distress in nusing homes : A qualitative study with examined registered nurses].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Moral distress: sometimes, there is no fix.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2026Review
- Health-oriented participatory leadership in European nursing homes: a qualitative cross-country study of support for employees and teams.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Stabilizing and Destabilizing Factors of Nurse Retention: A Comparative Analysis of Two Healthcare Settings in Austria.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Dissonance as a productive force in the emergence of alternative crisis support and impetus for social change-principles and organizational form of the association Open Dialogue Leipzig e.V.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- [HeilberufeSCIENCE · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the nursing home setting has some characteristic features that are relevant with respect to the development of moral distress (MD), it has so far been studied primarily in the acute care setting. The underlying classical definition of MD is increasingly criticized and broadening of this definition is encouraged to include stress due to moral uncertainty. Hence, the present qualitative study explored how nursing personnel in nursing homes experience MD. Guided interviews were conducted with 21 nurses from 5 nursing homes. The fully transcribed interviews were analyzed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis, whereby deductive (scaling and content structuring) and inductive techniques were applied. The application of scaling structuring revealed that MD was experienced mainly in a moderately severe form. The respondents reported situations where they experienced moral stress because they were impeded by barrieres to take the morally correct action. These situations were inductively summarized in the categories "unnecessary/false treatment at the end of life", "incorrect management of challenging behavior", "poor care in general" and "unnecessary hospital transfers". Decisions made by relatives and physicians were the most frequently mentioned external barrier and a lack of courage was the most frequently named internal barrier; however, the respondents also mentioned stress reactions corresponding to the category "moral uncertainty", especially during end of life care and for hospital transfer decisions, most of all when the resident's wish was not clear or due to unavailability of physicians. The results underline the necessity of a broad conception of MD at the theoretical and interventional levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.