Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31696338›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

Spinal surgery complications: an unsolved problem-Is the World Health Organization Safety Surgical Checklist an useful tool to reduce them?

Giovanni Barbanti-Brodano, Cristiana Griffoni, Jarkko Halme, Giuseppe Tedesco, Silvia Terzi, Stefano Bandiera, Riccardo Ghermandi, Gisberto Evangelisti, Marco Girolami, Valerio Pipola and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Negative pressure wound therapy in the management of postoperative spinal wound infections: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Factors associated with increased length of stay and risk of complications in 336 patients submitted to spine surgery. The role of a validated capture system (SAVES v2) as a first-line tool to properly face the problem.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Multi-domain biopsychosocial postoperative recovery trajectories associate with patient outcomes following lumbar fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Giovanni Barbanti-BrodanoDepartment of Oncological and Degenerative Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G.C. Pupilli, 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy. giovanni@barbantibrodano.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7075-7020
Cristiana GriffoniDepartment of Oncological and Degenerative Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G.C. Pupilli, 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Jarkko HalmeDepartment of Orthopaedic Trauma and Hand Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Giuseppe TedescoDepartment of Oncological and Degenerative Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G.C. Pupilli, 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Silvia TerziDepartment of Oncological and Degenerative Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G.C. Pupilli, 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Stefano BandieraDepartment of Oncological and Degenerative Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G.C. Pupilli, 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Riccardo GhermandiDepartment of Oncological and Degenerative Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G.C. Pupilli, 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Gisberto EvangelistiDepartment of Oncological and Degenerative Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G.C. Pupilli, 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Marco GirolamiDepartment of Oncological and Degenerative Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G.C. Pupilli, 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Valerio PipolaDepartment of Oncological and Degenerative Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G.C. Pupilli, 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro GasbarriniDepartment of Oncological and Degenerative Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G.C. Pupilli, 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Asdrubal FalavignaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate whether the World Health Organization Safety Surgical Checklist (SSC) is an effective tool to reduce complications in spinal surgery.

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiological charts prospectively collected from patients who underwent a spinal surgery procedure from January 2010 to December 2012. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of complications between two periods, from January to December 2010 (without checklist) and from January 2011 and December 2012 (with checklist), in order to assess the checklist's effectiveness.

resultsThe sample size was 917 patients with an average of 30-month follow-up. The mean age was 52.88 years. The majority of procedures were performed for oncological diseases (54.4%) and degenerative diseases (39.8%). In total, 159 complications were detected (17.3%). The overall incidence of complications for trauma, infectious pathology, oncology, and degenerative disease was 22.2%, 19.2%, 18.4%, and 15.3%, respectively. No correlation was observed between the type of pathology and the complication incidence. We observed a reduction in the overall incidence of complications following the introduction of the SSC: In 2010 without checklist, the incidence of complications was 24.2%, while in 2011 and 2012, following the checklist introduction, the incidence of complications was 16.7% and 11.7%, respectively (mean 14.2%).

conclusionsThe SSC seems to be an effective tool to reduce complications in spinal surgery. We propose to extend the use of checklist system also to the preoperative and postoperative phases in order to further reduce the incidence of complications. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

ChecklistPatient SafetyHumansMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesWorld Health OrganizationChecklistClinical outcomesComplicationsPatient safetySpine surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.