ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2019
[Catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias : Forms of energy and biophysical principles].
Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Pain: Mechanistic Insights and Emerging Innovations.Cureus · 2025Review
- X-ray exposure in cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation over 7 years: A single center study.Journal of arrhythmia · 2022Article
- Thermal Analysis of Heat Transfer from Catheters and Implantable Devices to the Blood Flow.Micromachines · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias has evolved over the years and has become a cornerstone in the modern treatment of various supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. The goal of ablation is to permanently damage myocardium that is critically involved in the individual arrhythmia mechanism. Different catheters and forms of energy are available. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is most common. Application of an alternating current at the catheter tip induces heating of tissue and, thus, leads to ablation of a targeted arrhythmogenic substrate. High temperatures (>70 °C at the catheter tip and >95 °C within the tissue) bear the risk of coagulum formation and steam pops and should be avoided, which limits power application. The evolution of irrigated RF ablation catheters enables the transfer of more power to the tissue and thereby increases the dimensions of the lesions. Cryoablation represents a valuable alternative. Cooling of tissue to -80 °C causes the intra- and extracellular formation of ice crystals, finally resulting in a dense circumscribed scar. The cryomapping procedure grants improved surveillance of the safety of ablation. Cryoenergy is very popular for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the cryoballoon. In addition to the laser balloon that is established for PVI, ultrasound, microwaves, and stereotactic irradiation complete the arsenal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.