Article3 Biotech2019
Article in 3 Biotech, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Environmental Resistome and Bacterial Novelty in Marine Isolates from the North Portuguese Coast.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Phototrophic bacteria as potential probiotics for corals.npj biodiversity · 2025Review
- Prokaryotic community structure and auxin biosynthesis in early developmental stages of farmed Atlantic Nori (Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- PlZAT10 binds to the ABA catabolism gene PlCYP707A2 promoter to mediate seed dormancy release in Paeonia lactiflora.Plant cell reports · 2024Article
- Unveiling the influence of salinity on bacterial microbiome assembly of halophytes and crops.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Tomato Plant Microbiota under Conventional and Organic Fertilization Regimes in a Soilless Culture System.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Comparative Genomics Reveals Genetic Diversity and Metabolic Potentials of the GenusMicrobiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Different effects of soil bacterial communities affected by biocontrol agent YH-07 on tomatoRSC advances · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The application of plant growth-promoting (PGP) bacterium in agriculture is expanding rapidly in recent years. With the development of microbial technology, new bacterial species effective in promoting plant growth have been identified. In this study, a PGP bacterium was isolated from marine sediments of the Yellow Sea in China. The confrontation culture test and pot experiments showed that strain YH-07
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.