ArticleEcology and evolution2019
Foraging ecology drives social information reliance in an avian eavesdropping community.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal information.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Selective selfishness in alarm calling behaviour by some members of wintering mixed-species groups of crested tits and willow tits.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Stable isotopes and foraging behaviors support the role of antipredator benefits in driving the association between two marine fishes.Oecologia · 2023Article
- A community context for aggression? Multi-species audience effects on territorial aggression in two species of Paridae.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Mixed company: a framework for understanding the composition and organization of mixed-species animal groups.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020Review
- Seasonal changes in mixed-species bird flocks and antipredator information.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Foraging ecology drives social information reliance in an avian eavesdropping community.Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vertebrates obtain social information about predation risk by eavesdropping on the alarm calls of sympatric species. In the Holarctic, birds in the family Paridae function as sentinel species; however, factors shaping eavesdroppers' reliance on their alarm calls are unknown. We compared three hypothesized drivers of eavesdropper reliance: (a) foraging ecology, (b) degree of sociality, and (c) call relevance (caller-to-eavesdropper body-size difference). In a rigorous causal-comparative design, we presented Tufted Titmouse (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.