Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31695861›Full record

ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2019

Bioengineering strategies of the uterus towards improving current investigative models and female reproductive health.

H Campo, I Cervelló, A Pellicer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H CampoFundación IVI, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
I Cervelló
A Pellicer
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ever since the inception of artificial reproductive technologies (ART), new advances have been developed in the lab and translated to the clinic to improve the reproductive outcome of patients. Tissue engineering (TE) adopts ideas and concepts from biology, bioengineering and material science amongst others, resulting in a promising and burgeoning multidisciplinary field of investigation within regenerative medicine. The main objective of the work presented in this thesis was to use TE based approaches to create different types of natural biomaterials obtained from decellularized porcine or rabbit uteri. We investigated if these different bioscaffolds could improve current investigative in vitro models while also showing potential to be used as therapeutic solutions. Decellularized whole organs are acellular vascularized scaffolds that could be used to create tissue-engineered, transplantable organs. However, they can also be processed further into thin sections, ECM hydrogels and coatings, and were used as biocompatible tissue-specific substrates for cell and embryo culture. Two animal models were used, the pig model demonstrated that our perfusion-based protocol (with or without a freeze/thaw step) successfully decellularizes large uteri, yielding a biocompatible material. Secondly, we adapted this protocol for the rabbit uterus and converted the acellular endometrium into tissue-specific ECM hydrogels and coatings. After characterization of these substrates their effect on in vitro embryo development was also examined. While DC organs could one day be used to resolve the main issues plaguing transplantations, endometrial ECM sections, hydrogels and coatings have shown the potential to become a platform used in the culture of stem/progenitor cells and primary culture cells to better maintain their tissue-specific phenotype, improving in vitro models. Furthermore, ECM hydrogels could possibly be used in the future in vivo, as part of a treatment of Asherman's syndrome and endometrial atrophy.

Indexed as

decellularizationECM hydrogelembryo cultureTissue engineeringuterine bioengineering

Identifiers

PMID31695861
PMCPMC6822955
OpenAlexW2991770833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.