ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2019
Recommendations for a standardised educational program in robot assisted gynaecological surgery: Consensus from the Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS).
Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Expert consensus on best content of a robotic surgical curriculum: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- The current status of robotic colorectal surgery training programmes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Evolving robotic surgery training and improving patient safety, with the integration of novel technologies.World journal of urology · 2021Pooled it
- The Influence of Surgical Complexity and Center Experience on Postoperative Morbidity After Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: Lessons Learned from the ROBOGYN-1004 Trial.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Trial
- Comparison of European regionwide and Japanese nationwide surveys on gynecologic robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic enterorrhaphy model for junior residents: A step closer to the fundamentals of robotic surgery manual skills assessment.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Pre-Procedural Robotic Surgery Curricula: A Systematic Review and Thematic Meta-Synthesis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Review
- Evaluation of robotic exposure among gynecological surgeons: results of survey from the young European advocates of robotic surgery (YEARS).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- International expert consensus-driven surgical process model for robot-assisted hysterectomy: Delphi study results.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Development of a Realistic Physical Phantom for Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy Training and Associated.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2026Article
- Safe technology use in the operating room and related factors.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Pioneering robotic surgery for complex gynecologic conditions: implementation beyond cancer care.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Training in the use of basic functions of the daVinci XiUpdates in surgery · 2025Article
- Guidelines for robotic credentialling in reconstructive and functional urology. Consensus study.BJUI compass · 2025Article
- Transferability of Technical Skills Across Robotic Surgery Platforms: A Scoping Review.Cureus · 2024Article
- Proficiency-based progression training in robot-assisted laparoscopy for endometrial cancer: peri-operative and survival outcomes from an observational cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Expanding Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecology Using the Potential of an Advanced Robotic System.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Surgical tele-mentoring using a robotic platform: initial experience in a military institution.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- What credentials are required for robotic-assisted surgery in reconstructive and functional urology?BJUI compass · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS) aims at developing a European consensus on core components of a curriculum for training and assessment in robot assisted gynaecological surgery.
methodsA Delphi process was initiated among a panel of 12 experts in robot assisted surgery invited through the SERGS. An online questionnaire survey was based on a literature search for standards in education in gynaecological robot assisted surgery. The survey was performed in three consecutive rounds to reach optimal consensus. The results of this survey were discussed by the panel and led to consensus recommendations on 39 issues, adhering to general principles of medical education.
resultsOn review there appeared to be no accredited training programs in Europe, and few in the USA. Recommendations for requirements of training centres, educational tools and assessment of proficiency varied widely. Stepwise and structured training together with validated assessment based on competencies rather than on volume emerged as prerequisites for adequate and safe learning. An appropriate educational environment and tools for training were defined. Although certification should be competence based, the panel recommended additional volume based criteria for both accreditation of training centres and certification of individual surgeons.
conclusionsConsensus was reached on minimum criteria for training in robot assisted gynaecological surgery. To transfer results into clinical practice, experts recommended a curriculum and guidelines that have now been endorsed by SERGS to be used to establish training programmes for robot assisted surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31695855PMC6822956What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.