Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31695798›Full record

ReviewTheranostics2019

Perspectives on Recent Progress in Focused Ultrasound Immunotherapy.

Natasha D Sheybani, Richard J Price

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Theranostics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Applications and Safety Considerations: 2024 Update.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. MR Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound for Breast Tumors.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natasha D SheybaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Richard J PriceDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

Immunotherapeutic Nanoparticle Delivery to Melanoma With MR-Guided Focused UltrasoundR01CA197111 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BULLOCK, TIMOTHY N, ENGELHARD, VICTOR H · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
MRI-Guided miRNA Nanoparticle Delivery to Glioblastoma With Focused UltrasoundR01EB020147 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HANES, JUSTIN S., PRICE, RICHARD J. · 2015 to 2018
$2.4M
Focused Ultrasound and Multifunctional Nanoparticle Vaccines as Adjuvant Strategies for Cancer ImmunotherapyF99CA234954 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SHEYBANI, NATASHA DIBA · 2018 to 2019
$81k
NCI NIH HHS F99 CA234954NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197111NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy holds tremendous promise as a strategy for eradicating solid tumors. However, poor T cell infiltration and persistence within most solid tumor microenvironments, as well as mechanisms of adaptive resistance, continue to severely limit the accessibility of most immunotherapies to a broad patient population. This limitation perpetuates the demand for allied therapeutic strategies. Among such strategies is focused ultrasound (FUS), a non-invasive, non-ionizing technique for precisely targeted acoustic energy deposition into tissues. FUS has gained remarkable attention over recent years as a modality for elicitation of immune mechanisms in cancer and other pathologies. In 2017, we published a comprehensive review paper detailing existing evidence for immune modulation and therapy with FUS, as well as impending challenges and opportunities of consideration for the field. Over the last two years, a multitude of clinical trials have come online to explore safety, feasibility, and efficacy of FUS for cancers of the brain and periphery - including the first clinical trial to combine FUS with immunotherapy. Moreover, the last two years have seen a surge in FUS immunotherapy presentations at therapeutic ultrasound scientific meetings. Given the burst of activity in this field, we submit that an update on FUS immunotherapy progress is timely. In this review, we offer an updated overview and perspectives on scientific and clinical development in the FUS immunotherapy domain.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierBrainHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunotherapyT-LymphocytesTumor MicroenvironmentUltrasonic TherapyUltrasonographyImmunologic Factorscancerfocused ultrasoundimmunotherapytargeted drug and gene delivery

Identifiers

PMID31695798
PMCPMC6831458
OpenAlexW2982402889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.