Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31695786›Full record

ReviewTheranostics2019

Current status and future trends of clinical diagnoses via image-based deep learning.

Jie Xu, Kanmin Xue, Kang Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Theranostics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Internal validation of a convolutional neural network pipeline for assessing meibomian gland structure from meibography.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jie XuBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Science Key Lab, Beijing, China.
Kanmin XueRoyal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia.
Kang ZhangFaculty of Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macau.
Beijing Tongren Hospital · CNMacau University of Science and Technology · MOThe Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the recent developments in deep learning technologies, artificial intelligence (AI) has gradually been transformed from cutting-edge technology into practical applications. AI plays an important role in disease diagnosis and treatment, health management, drug research and development, and precision medicine. Interdisciplinary collaborations will be crucial to develop new AI algorithms for medical applications. In this paper, we review the basic workflow for building an AI model, identify publicly available databases of ocular fundus images, and summarize over 60 papers contributing to the field of AI development.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceDeep LearningDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansMachine LearningPrecision Medicineartificial intelligencedeep learningmachine learningophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID31695786
PMCPMC6831476
OpenAlexW2982692821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.