Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31695725›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in zoology2019

Individual variation of the masticatory system dominates 3D skull shape in the herbivory-adapted marsupial wombats.

Vera Weisbecker, Thomas Guillerme, Cruise Speck, Emma Sherratt, Hyab Mehari Abraha, Alana C Sharp, Claire E Terhune, Simon Collins, Stephen Johnston, Olga Panagiotopoulou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Vera Weisbecker1School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2370-4046
Thomas Guillerme1School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Cruise Speck1School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Emma Sherratt2School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Hyab Mehari Abraha3Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy & Developmental Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Alana C Sharp4Department of Cell & Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.
Claire E Terhune6Department of Anthropology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, USA.
Simon Collins7School of Agricultural and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Stephen Johnston7School of Agricultural and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Olga Panagiotopoulou3Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy & Developmental Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUDiscovery Institute · USThe University of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWithin-species skull shape variation of marsupial mammals is widely considered low and strongly size-dependent (allometric), possibly due to developmental constraints arising from the altricial birth of marsupials. However, species whose skulls are impacted by strong muscular stresses - particularly those produced through mastication of tough food items - may not display such intrinsic patterns very clearly because of the known plastic response of bone to muscle activity of the individual. In such cases, allometry may not dominate within-species shape variation, even if it is a driver of evolutionary shape divergence; ordination of shape in a geometric morphometric context through principal component analysis (PCA) should reveal main variation in areas under masticatory stress (incisor region/zygomatic arches/mandibular ramus); but this main variation should emerge from high individual variability and thus have low eigenvalues.

resultsWe assessed the evidence for high individual variation through 3D geometric morphometric shape analysis of crania and mandibles of three species of grazing-specialized wombats, whose diet of tough grasses puts considerable strain on their masticatory system. As expected, we found little allometry and low Principal Component 1 (PC1) eigenvalues within crania and mandibles of all three species. Also as expected, the main variation was in the muzzle, zygomatic arches, and masticatory muscle attachments of the mandibular ramus. We then implemented a new test to ask if the landmark variation reflected on PC1 was reflected in individuals with opposite PC1 scores and with opposite shapes in Procrustes space. This showed that correspondence between individual and ordinated shape variation was limited, indicating high levels of individual variability in the masticatory apparatus. DISCUSSION: Our results are inconsistent with hypotheses that skull shape variation within marsupial species reflects a constraint pattern. Rather, they support suggestions that individual plasticity can be an important determinant of within-species shape variation in marsupials (and possibly other mammals) with high masticatory stresses, making it difficult to understand the degree to which intrinsic constraints act on shape variation at the within-species level. We conclude that studies that link micro- and macroevolutionary patterns of shape variation might benefit from a focus on species with low-impact mastication, such as carnivorous or frugivorous species.

Indexed as

ConstraintCraniumGeometric morphometricsMandibleMarsupialMastication

Identifiers

PMID31695725
PMCPMC6824091
OpenAlexW2984644513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.