Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31695618›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2019

Surprising Anticancer Activities of Psychiatric Medications: Old Drugs Offer New Hope for Patients With Brain Cancer.

Chuanjun Zhuo, Zhiyuan Xun, Weihong Hou, Feng Ji, Xiaodong Lin, Hongjun Tian, Weifang Zheng, Min Chen, Chuanxin Liu, Wenqiang Wang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Emerging role of MYB transcription factors in cancer drug resistance.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. The effect of anticonvulsants on survival among patients with GBM brain tumors undergoing radiation: A SEER-Medicare analysis.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Chuanjun ZhuoDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Mental Health, Psychiatric Genetics Laboratory (PSYG-Lab), Jining Medical University, Jining, China.
Zhiyuan XunDepartment of Psychiatric-Neuroimaging-Genetics and Morbidity Laboratory (PNGC-Lab), Nankai University Affiliated Anding Hospital, Tianjin Mental Health Center, Mental Health Teaching Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Weihong HouDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Feng JiDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Mental Health, Psychiatric Genetics Laboratory (PSYG-Lab), Jining Medical University, Jining, China.
Xiaodong LinDepartment of Psychiatry, Wenzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Hongjun TianDepartment of Psychiatric-Neuroimaging-Genetics and Morbidity Laboratory (PNGC-Lab), Nankai University Affiliated Anding Hospital, Tianjin Mental Health Center, Mental Health Teaching Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Weifang ZhengDepartment of Psychiatry, Wenzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Min ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Mental Health, Psychiatric Genetics Laboratory (PSYG-Lab), Jining Medical University, Jining, China.
Chuanxin LiuDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Mental Health, Psychiatric Genetics Laboratory (PSYG-Lab), Jining Medical University, Jining, China.
Wenqiang WangDepartment of China-Canada Biological Psychiatry Lab, Xiamen Xianyue Hospital, Xiamen, China.
Ce ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, Wenzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Jining Medical University · CNWenzhou City People's Hospital · CNTianjin Medical University · CNTianjin Anding Hospital · CNTianjin haihe hospital · CNUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite decades of research and major efforts, malignant brain tumors remain among the deadliest of all cancers. Recently, an increasing number of psychiatric drugs has been proven to possess suppressing activities against brain tumors, and rapid progress has been made in understanding the potential mechanisms of action of these drugs. In particular, the traditional mood stabilizer valproic acid, the widely used antidepressants fluoxetine and escitalopram oxalate, and the atypical psychiatric drug aripiprazole have demonstrated promise for application in brain tumor treatment strategies through multiple lines of laboratory, preclinical, and clinical evidence. The unexpected discovery of the anticancer properties of these drugs has ignited interest in the repurposing of other psychiatric drugs to combat brain cancer. In this review, we synthesize recent progress in understanding the potential molecular mechanisms underlying the brain cancer-killing activities of representative psychiatric drugs. We also identify key limitations in the repurposing of these medications that must be overcome to enhance our ability to successfully prevent and treat brain cancer, especially in the most vulnerable groups of patients, such as children and adolescents, pregnant women, and those with unfavorable genetic variants. Moreover, we propose perspectives that may guide future research and provide long-awaited new hope to patients with brain cancer and their families.

Indexed as

bipolar disorderbrain cancerdepressionglioblastoma multiformepsychiatric disorderpsychiatric drugschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID31695618
PMCPMC6817617
OpenAlexW2982016234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.