ArticleInfection and drug resistance2019
Outbreak Of
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- In-depth analysis of Klebsiella aerogenes resistome, virulome and plasmidome worldwide.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Characterization of host and escherichia coli strains causing recurrent urinary tract infections based on molecular typing.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
- Emergence of NDM-5 Producing Carbapenem-ResistantFrontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria on the Mobile Phones and Computer Keyboards of Healthcare University Students in Ghana.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2021Article
- Whole-Genome Sequencing of Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolated From Bovine Mastitis and Raw Milk: The First Emergence of ColistinFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the molecular characteristics and prevalence of clinical carbapenem-resistant
methodsAntimicrobial susceptibility test, using 17 antibiotics, was performed on 14 CRKA isolates. The strains were examined for the presence of β-lactamase genes by PCR, and efflux pump phenotype was determined by efflux pump inhibition test. Presence of outer-membrane porins was examined. Clonal relatedness among the isolates was investigated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). S1 nuclease-PFGE and plasmid incompatibility group analysis were performed to determine plasmids, and the genetic environment of
resultsThe 14 CRKA isolates were all resistant to carbapenems; five distinct groups (PFGE types A-E) were observed. All 14 isolates carried the
conclusionOur findings suggest both transposons and vertical transmission to contribute to the transformation of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.