Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31695402›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2019

Experience of patients and practitioners with a team and technology approach to chronic back disorder management.

Stacey Lovo, L Harrison, M E O'Connell, C Trask, B Bath

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Telerehabilitation is as effective as outpatient visits in the management of early osteoarthritis knee and mechanical low backache.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stacey LovoSchool of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 2Z4, Canada.
L HarrisonSchool of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 2Z4, Canada.
M E O'ConnellCollege of Arts and Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A5, Canada.
C TraskCanadian Centre for Health and Safety in Agriculture, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 2Z4, Canada.
B BathSchool of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 2Z4, Canada.
University of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough rural and remote residents face general challenges accessing health care in comparison to urban dwellers, care for musculoskeletal conditions like chronic back disorders (CBD) is particularly challenging for rural and remote residents due to lack of access to physical yherapists. Telerehabilitation such as secure videoconferencing offers one solution to this disparity in rural care delivery, but incorporating the perspectives of health practitioners and patients is important when developing new sustainable care models. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis study investigated the experiences of practitioners and patients during a novel interprofessional model of assessment where an urban-based physical therapist used videoconferencing to virtually join a rural nurse practitioner and a rural patient with CBD. Patient surveys and semi-structured interviews of practitioners and patients were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively.

resultsMost patients were "very satisfied" (62.1%) or "satisfied" (31.6%) with the overall experience, and "very" (63.1%) or "somewhat (36.9%) confident" with the assessment. Thematic analysis of interviews revealed that this novel assessment method identified: access to care for CBD, effective interprofessional practice, enhanced clinical care for CBD, and technology considerations.

conclusionPatient satisfaction with the telerehabilitation model of care was high. Patients and practitioners reported their experiences were impacted by access to care, interprofessional practice, enhanced care for CBD and technology. These findings will be useful in the development of patient-centered models of care utilizing telehealth strategies.

Indexed as

interprofessional relationslow back painpatient-centered carephysical therapytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID31695402
PMCPMC6811366
OpenAlexW2980752534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.