Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31695360›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2019

Novel chitosan/agarose/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue engineering applications: comprehensive evaluation of biocompatibility and osteoinductivity with the use of osteoblasts and mesenchymal stem cells.

Paulina Kazimierczak, Aleksandra Benko, Marek Nocun, Agata Przekora

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Biomaterials for extrusion-based bioprinting and biomedical applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Polymers · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paulina KazimierczakDepartment of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Aleksandra BenkoFaculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Krakow, Poland.
Marek NocunFaculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Krakow, Poland.
Agata PrzekoraDepartment of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
AGH University of Krakow · PLMedical University of Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNanocomposites produced by reinforcement of polysaccharide matrix with nanoparticles are widely used in engineering of biomaterials. However, clinical applications of developed novel biomaterials are often limited due to their poor biocompatibility. PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to comprehensively assess biocompatibility of highly macroporous chitosan/agarose/nanohydroxyapatite bone scaffolds produced by a novel method combining freeze-drying with a foaming agent. Within these studies, blood plasma protein adsorption, osteoblast (MC3T3-E1 Subclone 4 and hFOB 1.19) adhesion and proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow and adipose tissue were determined. The obtained results were also correlated with materials' surface chemistry and wettability to explain the observed protein and cellular response.

resultsObtained results clearly showed that the developed nanocomposite scaffolds were characterized by high biocompatibility and osteoconductivity. Importantly, the scaffolds also revealed osteoinductive properties since they have the ability to induce osteogenic differentiation (Runx2 synthesis) in undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells. The surface of biomaterials is extremely hydrophilic, prone to protein adsorption with the highest affinity toward fibronectin binding, which allows for good osteoblast adhesion, spreading, and proliferation.

conclusionProduced by a novel method, macroporous nanocomposite biomaterials have great potential to be used in regenerative medicine for acceleration of the bone healing process.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationAdsorptionAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomarkersBone and BonesCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCell LineCell MovementCell ProliferationChitosanCore Binding Factor Alpha 1 SubunitDogsDurapatiteFemaleBiocompatible MaterialsBiomarkersChitosanCore Binding Factor Alpha 1 SubunitDurapatiteSepharosecell proliferationcryogelosteogenic differentiationprotein adsorptionwettabilityXPS

Identifiers

PMID31695360
PMCPMC6707379
OpenAlexW2967584417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.