Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31695317›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2019

Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of two intraocular lenses with distinct diffractive optics.

André Lins de Medeiros, Flavio Jones Saraiva, Camila Ishii Iguma, Danilo Varela Kniggendorf, Guilherme Alves, Mario Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves, Cesar Vilar, Antonio Francisco Pimenta Motta, Pedro Carlos Carricondo, Celso Takashi Nakano and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04570579 (Impact of a Novel Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens on Visual and Lifestyle Enhancement), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04570579 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Impact of a Novel Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens on Visual and Lifestyle Enhancement

TypeobservationalSponsorAlanna Nattis, DORan2020 to 2025Enrolled46ConditionsCataract, Cataract Senile, PresbyopiaArmsVivity Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

André Lins de MedeirosCataract Sector, Renato Ambrosio Eye Research Center, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Flavio Jones SaraivaCataract Sector, Hospital Oftalmológico De Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Camila Ishii IgumaCataract Sector, Hospital Oftalmológico De Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Danilo Varela KniggendorfCataract Sector, Renato Ambrosio Eye Research Center, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Guilherme AlvesCataract Sector, Hospital Oftalmológico De Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Mario Augusto Pereira Dias ChavesCataract Sector, Renato Ambrosio Eye Research Center, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Cesar VilarCataract Sector, Renato Ambrosio Eye Research Center, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Antonio Francisco Pimenta MottaCataract Sector, Renato Ambrosio Eye Research Center, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Pedro Carlos CarricondoCataract Sector, Renato Ambrosio Eye Research Center, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Celso Takashi NakanoCataract Sector, Renato Ambrosio Eye Research Center, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Walton NoséCataract Sector, Renato Ambrosio Eye Research Center, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Wilson Takashi HidaCataract Sector, Renato Ambrosio Eye Research Center, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to compare the visual outcomes and subjective visual quality between bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens, J&J Vision Tecnis Symfony

methodsThis prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study of consecutive cases assessed 52 eyes of 26 patients operated on by the same surgeon (WTH) and binocularly implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses between May 2016 and July 2018. Binocular visual acuity for far, intermediate and near was tested in all cases. Ophthalmological evaluation included the measurement of binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 40 cm, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) at 70 cm, monocular visual defocus curve and the quality of life (QoL) questionnaire, National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 ( NEI-VFQ 25).

resultsPostoperative UDVA was 0.00 and 0.09 logMAR (

conclusionBoth groups reported good subjective quality of vision regarding long, intermediate and short distances. Group A had a better performance for binocular UDVA, UIVA at 70 cm and CDVA, while regarding the monocular defocus curve, Group A outperformed Group B for long distances. Furthermore, Group B surpassed it in the short to very short distances, between the range of ≥2.00 D to 5.00 D of vergence. While Group A had a better performance regarding the vergences between 0.00 and 1.00 D (

Indexed as

cataractchromatic aberrationopticsphacoemulsificationsurgeryvisual performance

Identifiers

PMID31695317
PMCPMC6718244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.