ArticleNature2019
Nature's reach: narrow work has broad impact.
Article in Nature, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis and prediction of cardiovascular research hotspots, trends and interdisciplinarity.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2026Article
- Interdisciplinary papers supported by disciplinary grants garner deep and broad scientific impact.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Applications of AI/ML in accelerating the development of pulmonary drug delivery system.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Prediction of transformative breakthroughs in biomedical research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The distinctive innovation patterns and network embeddedness of scientific prizewinners.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Hidden citations obscure true impact in science.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Citation network analysis for viewpoint plurality assessment of historical corpora: The case of the medieval rabbinic literature.PloS one · 2024Article
- A network-based normalized impact measure reveals successful periods of scientific discovery across discipline.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Data, measurement and empirical methods in the science of science.Nature human behaviour · 2023Review
- Poaceae Chloroplast Genome Sequencing: Great Leap Forward in Recent Ten Years.Current genomics · 2023Review
- Quantifying the rise and fall of scientific fields.PloS one · 2022Article
- Interdisciplinary collaboration from diverse science teams can produce significant outcomes.PloS one · 2022Article
- Scientific X-ray: Scanning and quantifying the idea evolution of scientific publications.PloS one · 2022Article
- Explosive and implosive root concepts: An analysis of music moods rooted by two influential rap artists.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article-Level Metrics.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Review
- Large-scale analysis of delayed recognition using sleeping beauty and the prince.Applied network science · 2021Article
- Evolution and transformation of early modern cosmological knowledge: a network study.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- A brain network that supports consensus-seeking and conflict-resolving of college couples' shopping interaction.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Construction, comparison and evolution of networks in life sciences and other disciplines.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31695218What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.