ArticleNature2019
Better methods can't make up for mediocre theory.
Article in Nature, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deciphering the topological landscape of glioma using a network theory framework.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Shifting the Level of Selection in Science.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024Article
- Evolution of Telencephalon Anterior-Posterior Patterning through Core Endogenous Network Bifurcation.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Meta-analysis: a tool for constructing theories or evaluating interventions or simply proving everyday assumptions?Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- The need for evolutionary theory in cancer research.European journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- NSF Fellows' perceptions about incentives, research misconduct, and scientific integrity in STEM academia.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- On the Role of Theory and Modeling in Neuroscience.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Measuring CHAOS? Evaluating the short-form Confusion, Hubbub And Order Scale.Collabra. Psychology · 2023Article
- Modeling psychopathology: From data models to formal theories.Psychological methods · 2022Review
- Some Recommendations on the Use of Daily Life Methods in Affective Science.Affective science · 2022Article
- Strategic identity signaling in heterogeneous networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Improving rigor and reproducibility in nonhuman primate research.American journal of primatology · 2021Review
- The natural selection of good science.Nature human behaviour · 2021Article
- Where Is Ethology Heading? An Invitation for Collective Metadisciplinary Discussion.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Practical Methodological Reform Needs Good Theory.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2021Article
- Invisible Hands and Fine Calipers: A Call to Use Formal Theory as a Toolkit for Theory Construction.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2021Article
- Theory Before the Test: How to Build High-Verisimilitude Explanatory Theories in Psychological Science.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2021Article
- Review
- Advances in the field of intranasal oxytocin research: lessons learned and future directions for clinical research.Molecular psychiatry · 2021Review
- Averting the Next Credibility Crisis in Psychological Science: Within-Person Methods for Personalized Diagnostics and Intervention.Journal for person-oriented research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31695216What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.