Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31695153›Full record

ReviewOncogene2020

Multifaceted roles of TAK1 signaling in cancer.

Himadri Mukhopadhyay, Nam Y Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. NG25 Enhances Anti-Tumor Immunity inOncoTargets and therapy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Gut microbes · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. RGMb drives macrophage infiltration to aggravate kidney disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. TAK1 Promotes an Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment through Cancer-Associated Fibroblast Phenotypic Conversion in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. PANoptosis: a new insight for oral diseases.Molecular biology reports · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Himadri MukhopadhyayDeparment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Nam Y LeeDeparment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. namlee@email.arizona.edu.
University of Arizona · US

Funding

Role of spectrin signaling complex in angiogenesisR01GM128055 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI LEE, NAM Y · 2019 to 2022
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM128055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context-specific signaling is a prevalent theme in cancer biology wherein individual molecules and pathways can have multiple or even opposite effects depending on the tumor type. TAK1 represents a particularly notable example of such signaling diversity in cancer progression. Originally discovered as a TGF-β-activated kinase, over the years it has been shown to respond to numerous other stimuli to phosphorylate a wide range of downstream targets and elicit distinct cellular responses across cell and tissue types. Here we present a comprehensive review of TAK1 signaling and provide important therapeutic perspectives related to its function in different cancers.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAnimalsDisease ProgressionHumansMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesNeoplasmsMAP Kinase Kinase Kinases

Identifiers

PMID31695153
PMCPMC7023988
OpenAlexW2983360620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.