ArticleScientific reports2019
Divergence in Transcriptional and Regulatory Responses to Mating in Male and Female Fruitflies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disentangling the reproductive and metabolic transcriptional responses to diet in Drosophila melanogaster.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Strategies for studying sex differences in brain aging.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2025Review
- Environmentally induced variation in sperm sRNAs is linked to gene expression and transposable elements in zebrafish offspring.Heredity · 2025Article
- Sex-Specific Effects of Social Environment on Behaviour and Their Correlations inEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Exposure to Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Leads to Specific Disorders of Spermatid Elongation via Multiple Metabolic Pathways inACS omega · 2024Article
- Genetic, Environmental, and Stochastic Components of Lifespan Variability: TheInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Review
- Transcriptional programs are activated and microRNAs are repressed within minutes after mating in the Drosophila melanogaster female reproductive tract.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Transcriptional misexpression in hybrids between species linked by gene flow is associated with patterns of sequence divergence.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Sex-biased gene expression in nutrient-sensing pathways.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Time series transcriptome analysis implicates the circadian clock in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Functional transcriptome analyses of Drosophila suzukii midgut reveal mating-dependent reproductive plasticity in females.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- The Chromosomal Distribution of Sex-Biased MicroRNAs in Drosophila is Nonadaptive.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Experimental sexual selection reveals rapid evolutionary divergence in sex-specific transcriptomes and their interactions following mating.Molecular ecology · 2022Article
- She's got nerve: roles of octopamine in insect female reproduction.Journal of neurogenetics · 2021Review
- Gene expression and alternative splicing dynamics are perturbed in female head transcriptomes following heterospecific copulation.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Article
- Parallel gene expression evolution in natural and laboratory evolved populations.Molecular ecology · 2021Article
- Article
- TheG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mating induces extensive physiological, biochemical and behavioural changes in female animals of many taxa. In contrast, the overall phenotypic and transcriptomic consequences of mating for males, hence how they might differ from those of females, are poorly described. Post mating responses in each sex are rapidly initiated, predicting the existence of regulatory mechanisms in addition to transcriptional responses involving de novo gene expression. That post mating responses appear different for each sex also predicts that the genome-wide signatures of mating should show evidence of sex-specific specialisation. In this study, we used high resolution RNA sequencing to provide the first direct comparisons of the transcriptomic responses of male and female Drosophila to mating, and the first comparison of mating-responsive miRNAs in both sexes in any species. As predicted, the results revealed the existence of sex- and body part-specific mRNA and miRNA expression profiles. More genes were differentially expressed in the female head-thorax than the abdomen following mating, whereas the opposite was true in males. Indeed, the transcriptional profile of male head-thorax tissue was largely unaffected by mating, and no differentially expressed genes were detected at the most stringent significance threshold. A subset of ribosomal genes in females were differentially expressed in both body parts, but in opposite directions, consistent with the existence of body part-specific resource allocation switching. Novel, mating-responsive miRNAs in each sex were also identified, and a miRNA-mRNA interactions analysis revealed putative targets among mating-responsive genes. We show that the structure of genome-wide responses by each sex to mating is strongly divergent, and provide new insights into how shared genomes can achieve characteristic distinctiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.