Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31695054›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Divergence in Transcriptional and Regulatory Responses to Mating in Male and Female Fruitflies.

Emily K Fowler, Thomas Bradley, Simon Moxon, Tracey Chapman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sex-biased gene expression in nutrient-sensing pathways.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Time series transcriptome analysis implicates the circadian clock in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  20. TheG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily K FowlerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK. e.fowler@uea.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5290-7630
Thomas BradleySchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0218-5021
Simon MoxonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4644-1816
Tracey ChapmanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2401-8120
University of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H002499/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H008047/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/J014524/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/L003139/1RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/R000891/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mating induces extensive physiological, biochemical and behavioural changes in female animals of many taxa. In contrast, the overall phenotypic and transcriptomic consequences of mating for males, hence how they might differ from those of females, are poorly described. Post mating responses in each sex are rapidly initiated, predicting the existence of regulatory mechanisms in addition to transcriptional responses involving de novo gene expression. That post mating responses appear different for each sex also predicts that the genome-wide signatures of mating should show evidence of sex-specific specialisation. In this study, we used high resolution RNA sequencing to provide the first direct comparisons of the transcriptomic responses of male and female Drosophila to mating, and the first comparison of mating-responsive miRNAs in both sexes in any species. As predicted, the results revealed the existence of sex- and body part-specific mRNA and miRNA expression profiles. More genes were differentially expressed in the female head-thorax than the abdomen following mating, whereas the opposite was true in males. Indeed, the transcriptional profile of male head-thorax tissue was largely unaffected by mating, and no differentially expressed genes were detected at the most stringent significance threshold. A subset of ribosomal genes in females were differentially expressed in both body parts, but in opposite directions, consistent with the existence of body part-specific resource allocation switching. Novel, mating-responsive miRNAs in each sex were also identified, and a miRNA-mRNA interactions analysis revealed putative targets among mating-responsive genes. We show that the structure of genome-wide responses by each sex to mating is strongly divergent, and provide new insights into how shared genomes can achieve characteristic distinctiveness.

Indexed as

Sexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingMaleMicroRNAsReproductionRNA, MessengerDrosophila ProteinsMicroRNAsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID31695054
PMCPMC6834580
OpenAlexW2987297261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.