Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31695050›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Comparison of oral microbiome profiles in stimulated and unstimulated saliva, tongue, and mouth-rinsed water.

Ryutaro Jo, Yuichiro Nishimoto, Kouta Umezawa, Kazuma Yama, Yuto Aita, Yuko Ichiba, Shinnosuke Murakami, Yasushi Kakizawa, Takashi Kumagai, Takuji Yamada and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Periodontal disease metabolomics signatures from different biofluids: a systematic review.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Tongue-coating microbiome as a predictor of solid tumors: an updated scoping review of clinical studies.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ryutaro JoOral Care Research Laboratories, Research and Development Headquarters, Lion Corporation. 7-2-1 Hirai, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, 132-0035, Japan.
Yuichiro NishimotoMetabologenomics, Inc. 246-2 Mizukami, Kakuganji, Tsuruoka, Yamagata, 997-0052, Japan.
Kouta UmezawaHiyoshi Oral Health Clinics. 2-1-16 Hiyoshi-cho, Sakata, Yamagata, 998-0037, Japan.
Kazuma YamaAdvanced Analytical Science Research Laboratories, Research and Development Headquarters, Lion Corporation. 7-2-1 Hirai, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, 132-0035, Japan.
Yuto AitaAdvanced Analytical Science Research Laboratories, Research and Development Headquarters, Lion Corporation. 7-2-1 Hirai, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, 132-0035, Japan.
Yuko IchibaAdvanced Analytical Science Research Laboratories, Research and Development Headquarters, Lion Corporation. 7-2-1 Hirai, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, 132-0035, Japan.
Shinnosuke MurakamiMetabologenomics, Inc. 246-2 Mizukami, Kakuganji, Tsuruoka, Yamagata, 997-0052, Japan.
Yasushi KakizawaAdvanced Analytical Science Research Laboratories, Research and Development Headquarters, Lion Corporation. 7-2-1 Hirai, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, 132-0035, Japan.
Takashi KumagaiHiyoshi Oral Health Clinics. 2-1-16 Hiyoshi-cho, Sakata, Yamagata, 998-0037, Japan.
Takuji YamadaMetabologenomics, Inc. 246-2 Mizukami, Kakuganji, Tsuruoka, Yamagata, 997-0052, Japan.
Shinji FukudaMetabologenomics, Inc. 246-2 Mizukami, Kakuganji, Tsuruoka, Yamagata, 997-0052, Japan. sfukuda@metagen.co.jp.
Lion Corporation (Japan) · JPKeio University · JPMiyoshi Kasei (Japan) · JPJapan Science and Technology Agency · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemiological studies using saliva have revealed relationships between the oral microbiome and many oral and systemic diseases. However, when collecting from a large number of participants such as a large-scale cohort study, the time it takes to collect saliva can be a problem. Mouth-rinsed water, which is water that has been used to rinse the oral cavity, can be used as an alternative method for collecting saliva for oral microbiome analysis because it can be collected in a shorter time than saliva. The purpose of this study was to verify whether mouth-rinsed water is a suitable saliva substitute for analyzing the oral microbiome. We collected samples of mouth-rinsed water, stimulated saliva, unstimulated saliva, and tongue coating from 10 systemic healthy participants, and compared the microbial diversity and composition of the samples using next-generation sequencing of 16S rRNA-encoding genes. The results showed that the microbial diversity of mouth-rinsed water was similar to that of unstimulated and stimulated saliva, and significantly higher than that of tongue-coating samples. The microbial composition at the species level of mouth-rinsed water also showed a very high correlation with the composition of unstimulated and stimulated saliva. These results suggest that the mouth-rinsed water is a suitable collection method instead of saliva for oral microbiome analysis.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAdultBacteriaBiodiversityCohort StudiesFemaleFresh WaterHumansMaleMouthMouthwashesSalivaTongueYoung AdultMouthwashes

Identifiers

PMID31695050
PMCPMC6834574
OpenAlexW2983291369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.