Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31694980›Full record

ReviewPediatrics2019

Ensuring the Life-Span Benefits of Newborn Screening.

Alex R Kemper, Coleen A Boyle, Jeffrey P Brosco, Scott D Grosse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Parent Reports of Developmental Service Utilization After Newborn Screening.International journal of neonatal screening · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advancing Newborn Screening Long-Term Follow-Up: Integration ofInternational journal of neonatal screening · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Evidence and recommendation for mucopolysaccharidosis type II newborn screening in the United States.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alex R KemperDivision of Ambulatory Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; alex.kemper@nationwidechildrens.org.
Coleen A BoyleNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; and.
Jeffrey P BroscoMailman Center for Child Development, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Scott D GrosseNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; and.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareHumansInfant, NewbornLongevityNeonatal Screening

Identifiers

PMID31694980
PMCPMC7202673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.