Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31694715›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2019

What are essential elements of high-quality palliative care at home? An interview study among patients and relatives faced with advanced cancer.

M G Oosterveld-Vlug, B Custers, J Hofstede, G A Donker, P M Rijken, J C Korevaar, A L Francke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Quality indicators of outpatient palliative care: A systematic review.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M G Oosterveld-VlugNivel, Netherlands institute for health services research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500, BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.oosterveld@nivel.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3911-1536
B CustersNivel, Netherlands institute for health services research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500, BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J HofstedeNivel, Netherlands institute for health services research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500, BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
G A DonkerNivel, Netherlands institute for health services research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500, BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
P M RijkenNivel, Netherlands institute for health services research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500, BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J C KorevaarNivel, Netherlands institute for health services research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500, BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
A L FranckeNivel, Netherlands institute for health services research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500, BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the Netherlands, general practitioners (GPs) and community nurses play a central role in the palliative care for home-dwelling patients with advanced cancer and their relatives. To optimize the palliative care provision at home, it is important to have insight in the elements that patients and relatives consider essential for high-quality palliative care, and whether these essentials are present in the actual care they receive.

methodsQualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 patients with advanced cancer and 14 relatives. The participants discussed their experiences with the care and support they received from the GP and community nurses, and their views on met and unmet needs. Interview data were analysed according to the principles of thematic analysis.

resultsPatients as well as relatives considered it important that their GP and community nursing staff are medically proficient, available, person-focused and proactive. Also, proper information transfer between care professionals and clear procedures when asking for certain resources or services were considered essential for good palliative care at home. Most interviewees indicated that these essential elements were generally present in the care they received. However, the requirements of 'proper information transfer between professionals' and 'clear and rapid procedures' were mentioned as more difficult to meet in actual practice. Patients and relatives also emphasized that an alert and assertive attitude on their own part was vital in ensuring they received the care they need. They expressed worries about other people who are less vigilant regarding the care they receive, or who have no family to support them in this.

conclusionsMedical proficiency, availability, a focus on the person, proper information transfer between professionals, clear procedures and proactivity on the part of GPs and community nursing staff are considered essential for good palliative care at home. Improvements are particularly warranted with regard to collaboration and information transfer between professionals, and current bureaucratic procedures. It is important for care professionals to ensure that the identified essential elements for high-quality palliative care at home are met, particularly for patients and relatives who are not so alert and assertive.

Indexed as

General PractitionersAgedAged, 80 and overClinical CompetenceCommunicationFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansInterprofessional RelationsInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNetherlandsNurses, Community HealthNurse's RoleCancerHome-care servicesPalliative carePrimary health careQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID31694715
PMCPMC6836458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.