Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31694644›Full record

ReviewBMC health services research2019

Efficiency of blood utilization in elective surgical patients.

Kibruyisfaw Zewdie, Abraham Genetu, Yeabsera Mekonnen, Tewodros Worku, Abat Sahlu, Dereje Gulilalt

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. La Tunisie medicale · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kibruyisfaw ZewdieDepartment of Surgery, Neurosurgery Unit, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Collage of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, P.O. box 9086, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. kziberg@gmail.com.
Abraham GenetuDepartment of Surgery, Cardiothoracic Unit, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Collage of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, P.O. box 9086, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Yeabsera MekonnenDepartment of Surgery, Cardiothoracic Unit, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Collage of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, P.O. box 9086, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tewodros WorkuDepartment of Surgery, Cardiothoracic Unit, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Collage of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, P.O. box 9086, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Abat SahluDepartment of Surgery, Neurosurgery Unit, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Collage of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, P.O. box 9086, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Dereje GulilaltDepartment of Surgery, Cardiothoracic Unit, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Collage of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, P.O. box 9086, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Addis Ababa University · ETTikur Anbessa Hospital · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRequesting blood prior to a surgical procedure for perioperative transfusion is a common practice in surgical patients. More unit of blood is requested than used by anticipating the patient will be transfused to provide a safety margin in an event of unexpected haemorrhage. Over requesting with minimal utilization results in significant wastage of blood, reagents and human resource. This study was conducted to assess blood utilization practice of the largest tertiary hospital in Ethiopia.

methodsA cross-sectional prospective study method was used. Data was collected using a Proforma questionnaire by perusal of each individual patient's records from December 1, 2017 to February 28, 2018.patient age, sex, department requesting the blood, level of operating surgeon, hemodynamic status, number of unit requested, number of unit crossed matched and number of unit transfused were collected. Efficiency of blood utilization was calculated with three indices: Crossmatch to transfusion ratio, transfusion probability, and transfusion index indices.

resultsBlood was requested for 406 patients and a total of 898 units were crossmatched for this patients. Overall Crossmatch to transfusion ration, transfusion probability and transfusion index were 7.6, 15.3% and 0.29 respectively. Results showed insignificant blood usage. Among different departments and units, better blood utilization was seen in neurosurgical unit with C/T ratio, TP and TI of 4.9, 24.4 and 0.6% respectively, while worst indices were from obstetrics unit with C/T ratio, TP and TI of 31.0, 6.5% and 0.06.

conclusionUsing all the three parameters for evaluation of efficiency of blood utilization, the practice in our hospital shows ineffective blood utilization in elective surgical procedure. Blood requesting physician should order the minimum blood anticipated to be used as much as possible.

Indexed as

Blood Grouping and CrossmatchingBlood TransfusionPreoperative CareCost-Benefit AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesElective Surgical ProceduresHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicProspective StudiesEfficiency of blood transfusionTikur Anbessa hospital EthiopiaTransfusion indexTransfusion probability

Identifiers

PMID31694644
PMCPMC6836486
OpenAlexW2987801834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.