Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31694625›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2019

Tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from dogs, Latvia, 2011-2016.

Agne Namina, Valentina Capligina, Maija Seleznova, Rudolfs Krumins, Darja Aleinikova, Agnija Kivrane, Sarmite Akopjana, Marija Lazovska, Inese Berzina, Renate Ranka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Co-Occurrence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Key molecules regulating the blood meals ofVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2024
    Article
  7. Tick-borne pathogensFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Canine Babesiosis Caused by LargeAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  10. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Occurrence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Agne NaminaLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites Str. 1, Riga, LV-1067, Latvia.
Valentina CapliginaLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites Str. 1, Riga, LV-1067, Latvia.
Maija SeleznovaLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites Str. 1, Riga, LV-1067, Latvia.
Rudolfs KruminsLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites Str. 1, Riga, LV-1067, Latvia.
Darja AleinikovaLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites Str. 1, Riga, LV-1067, Latvia.
Agnija KivraneLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites Str. 1, Riga, LV-1067, Latvia.
Sarmite AkopjanaLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites Str. 1, Riga, LV-1067, Latvia.
Marija LazovskaLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites Str. 1, Riga, LV-1067, Latvia.
Inese BerzinaLatvia University of Agriculture, Jelgava, Latvia.
Renate RankaLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites Str. 1, Riga, LV-1067, Latvia. renate_r@biomed.lu.lv.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3716-7950

Funding

ERDF project Nr. 1.1.1.1/16/A/044.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent tick species are able to transmit different pathogens, and tick-borne diseases are of substantial concern worldwide for both humans and animals. Environmental changes and changes in the range of tick species, including Dermacentor reticulatus in Europe, can affect the spread of zoonotic pathogens. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of the tick-borne pathogens in ticks removed from dogs in Latvia, and to explore possible changes between years 2011 and 2016.

resultsIn 2011, only Ixodes ticks (221 Ixodes ricinus and 22 Ixodes persulcatus) were collected from dogs, while in 2016 tick samples belonged to Ixodes ricinus (360), Ixodes persulcatus (2) and Dermacentor reticulatus (27) species. In total, 35.8 and 40.0% of adult ticks were pathogen-positive in 2011 and 2016, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The molecular analysis indicated the presence of 13 tick-borne microorganisms; the most prevalent pathogen was Rickettsia, followed by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato group spirochetes, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia species. Borrelia miyamotoi was also present. A co-infection with two and three tick-borne pathogens was detected in 7.9 and 7.4% of Ixodes ricinus and Dermacentor reticulatus, respectively. The results of this study confirmed that the spread of novel vectors could bring additional risk of exposure to novel emerging pathogens to pets and their owners, as both Babesia canis and Rickettsia raoultii were shown to be highly associated with Dermacentor reticulatus ticks in Latvia.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the potential danger from the inadvertent introduction of novel disease pathogens and vectors. Awareness of co-infections and Dermacentor reticulatus-related pathogens needs to be increased.

Indexed as

Anaplasma phagocytophilumAnimalsArthropod VectorsBabesiaBorreliaCoinfectionDermacentorDogsIxodesLatviaRickettsiaTick-Borne DiseasesTick InfestationsDermacentorDogsIxodesLatviaTick-borne pathogensTicks

Identifiers

PMID31694625
PMCPMC6836430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.