ArticleBMC complementary and alternative medicine2019
Complementary and alternative medicine use among infertile women attending infertility specialty clinics in South Korea: does perceived severity matter?
Article in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of exercise intervention on quality of life and exercise capacity in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- The Prevalence of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use among Infertile Patients: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2024Pooled it
- Navigating the decision landscape: understanding interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome patients' motivations and medical support needs for fecal microbiota transplantation: a qualitative research.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- Use of complementary and alternative medicine among females with polycystic ovary syndrome in Jordan: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- A Survey of Utilization and Satisfaction of Korean Subfertility Treatment among Korean Women.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effect of alternative and complementary medicine on male infertility: An umbrella review.Health science reports · 2024Article
- The Treatment of Complementary and Alternative Medicine on Female Infertility Caused by Endometrial Factors.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Review
- Complementary and alternative medicine use in infertility: A review of infertile women's needs.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Review
- The Application of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Infertility.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Review
- Acupuncture and herbal medicine for female infertility: an overview of systematic reviews.Integrative medicine research · 2021Review
- Exploring Reproductive Health Education Needs in Infertile Women in Iran: A Qualitative Study.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2020Article
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Usage and Its Determinant Factors Among Infertile Men in Iran.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2020Article
- Low semen quality and adverse histological changes in testes of adult male mice treated with bee venom (Open veterinary journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among infertile women is popular in many countries, including Korea. Previous research has repeatedly found more than half of infertile women surveyed use CAM therapies for fertility enhancement and overall well-being. However, there is currently little evidence to support this practice, and this raises the question of infertile women's experiences in the uptake of those modalities and sociodemographic and psychological factors associated with CAM use. Thus, this study aims to explore the perceptions and experiences of infertile women with regard to their use of CAM in Korea.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using data from 263 infertile women attending infertility specialty clinics in Seoul, Korea, in June 2012. The survey instrument included 47 questions on the use of CAM, demographic characteristics, health status, and infertility related factors such as duration and type of infertility, experience and satisfaction of conventional treatment, and self-perceived severity of infertility condition. Chi-square test and logistic regression were used for data analysis.
resultsAmong 286 respondents (response rate, 95.3%), a total of 263 women were included in the final analysis. 63.5% of respondents used one or more types of CAM modalities during infertility treatment. The utilization of CAM was associated with employment status, duration of infertility treatment, and self-perceived severity of the disease. The most commonly used CAM modalities were multivitamin and herbal medicine, and differences in types of CAM modalities used were found between the group with a higher rating of self-perceived disease severity and the lower perceived severity group.
conclusionsHigh prevalence of CAM use among infertile women was observed in Korea. Our findings support that infertile women's own understanding of their illness and physical condition influences self-care behavior such as CAM use. This calls for an urgent need for further in-depth study of the clinical effects of popular CAM modalities among infertile women when used in conjunction with conventional treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.