Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31694522›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Quality control of imbalanced mass spectra from isotopic labeling experiments.

Tianjun Li, Long Chen, Min Gan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tianjun LiDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Macau, Taipa, Macau, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9127-8889
Long ChenDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Macau, Taipa, Macau, China. longchen@um.edu.mo.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0184-5446
Min GanCollege of Mathematics and Computer Science, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2756-0054

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMass spectra are usually acquired from the Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis for isotope labeled proteomics experiments. In such experiments, the mass profiles of labeled (heavy) and unlabeled (light) peptide pairs are represented by isotope clusters (2D or 3D) that provide valuable information about the studied biological samples in different conditions. The core task of quality control in quantitative LC-MS experiment is to filter out low-quality peptides with questionable profiles. The commonly used methods for this problem are the classification approaches. However, the data imbalance problems in previous control methods are often ignored or mishandled. In this study, we introduced a quality control framework based on the extreme gradient boosting machine (XGBoost), and carefully addressed the imbalanced data problem in this framework.

resultsIn the XGBoost based framework, we suggest the application of the Synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) to re-balance data and use the balanced data to train the boosted trees as the classifier. Then the classifier is applied to other data for the peptide quality assessment. Experimental results show that our proposed framework increases the reliability of peptide heavy-light ratio estimation significantly.

conclusionsOur results indicate that this framework is a powerful method for the peptide quality assessment. For the feature extraction part, the extracted ion chromatogram (XIC) based features contribute to the peptide quality assessment. To solve the imbalanced data problem, SMOTE brings a much better classification performance. Finally, the XGBoost is capable for the peptide quality control. Overall, our proposed framework provides reliable results for the further proteomics studies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArea Under CurveHumansIsotope LabelingMass SpectrometryPeptidesQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsROC CurvePeptidesGradient BoostingImbalanced DataMass SpectraProteomicsQuality Control

Identifiers

PMID31694522
PMCPMC6833298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.