Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31694055›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2019

Patients as Agents in Behavioral Health Research and Service Provision: Recommendations to Support the Learning Health System.

Hannah K Galvin, Carolyn Petersen, Vignesh Subbian, Anthony Solomonides

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patient Roles and Patient Knowledge in Learning Health Systems.The International journal of health planning and management · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Global Collaboration Around Digital Mental Health: The LAMP Consortium.Journal of technology in behavioral science · 2022
    Article
  8. Conceptualizing patient participation in psychiatry: A survey describing the voice of patients in outpatient care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah K GalvinLahey Health, Burlington, Massachusetts, United States.
Carolyn PetersenDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Vignesh SubbianDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Anthony SolomonidesDepartment of Systems and Industrial Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Authentic inclusion and engagement of behavioral health patients in their care delivery and in the process of scientific discovery are often challenged in the health care system. Consequently, there is a growing need to engage with and better serve the needs of behavioral health patients, particularly by leveraging health information technologies. In this work, we present rationale and strategies for improving patient engagement in this population in research and clinical care. First, we describe the potential for creating meaningful patient-investigator partnerships in behavioral health research to allow for cocreation of knowledge with patients. Second, in the context of behavioral health services, we explore the utility of sharing clinical notes to promote patients' agency in care delivery. Both lines of inquiry are centered in a Learning Health System model for behavioral health, where patients are agents in enhancing the therapeutic alliance and advancing the process of knowledge generation. Recommendations include genuinely democratizing the health care system and biomedical research enterprise through patient-centered information technologies such as patient portals. In research and technology development, we recommend seeking and tailoring behavioral health patients' involvement to their abilities, promoting patient input in data analysis plans, evaluating research and informatics initiatives for patients and clinicians, and sharing success and research findings with patients. In clinical practice, we recommend encouraging patients to read behavioral health notes on portals, engaging in proactive communication regarding note content, assessing outcomes including stress and anxiety in response to note content, and working with technology providers to support note-sharing governance and deployment.

Indexed as

Health ServicesLearning Health SystemResearchHumans

Identifiers

PMID31694055
PMCPMC6834452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.