ArticlePain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain2020
Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain: Prospective Case Series With 1 Year of Sustained Relief Following Short-Term Implant.
Article in Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05649917 (A Post-Market Observational Case Series Study of Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Post-Market Observational Case Series Study of Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) for the Treatment of Chronic Shoulder Pain
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation of the lumbar medial branches to usual care with standard interventional management for chronic low back pain-a multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RESET).Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2026Trial
- Observations from the RESET clinical trial: A post-hoc per protocol analysis of clinical outcomes with percutaneous 60-day medial branch PNS in chronic low back pain.Interventional pain medicine · 2026Article
- Online Charge Balancing With Active Impedance Monitoring in Programmable Stimulator to Extend Electrode Lifetime.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2026Article
- Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Low Back Pain: A Review of the Recent Literature.Current pain and headache reports · 2025Review
- Pain intensity and opioid consumption after temporary and permanent peripheral nerve stimulation: a 2-year multicenter analysis.Regional anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025Article
- Temporary Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) of the Cervical Medial Branch Nerve (CMBN) for Chronic Axial Neck Pain-A Literature Review and Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Patient-Reported Outcomes with Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Low Back Pain from Vertebral Plana Deformities: A Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Four-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective, Multicenter Study of Percutaneous 60-Day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain.Pain and therapy · 2025Article
- Review of Guidelines for Implantable Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) in the Management of Chronic Pain.Current pain and headache reports · 2025Review
- Cost Savings in Chronic Pain Patients Initiating Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) with a 60-Day PNS Treatment.Pain and therapy · 2025Article
- 60-Day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Knee Pain: A Retrospective Analysis.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
- An Evidence-Based Consensus for the Use of Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Non-Surgical Low Back Pain: The NEURON Group.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
- Consensus Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience for the Use of 60-Day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Therapy. A NEURON Living Guideline Project.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Mechanism of Action of Temporary Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.Current pain and headache reports · 2024Review
- Sequential Bilateral Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of Lumbar Medial Branches Following Laminectomy: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Advancements in Modern Treatment Approaches for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- A review of prospective studies regarding percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation treatment in the management of chronic pain.Pain management · 2024Review
- Retrospective Evaluation of Bipolar Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Nociceptive and Neuropathic Pain: A Pilot Study.Journal of pain research · 2024Article
- Pathophysiology of Pain and Mechanisms of Neuromodulation: A Narrative Review (A Neuron Project).Journal of pain research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPercutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) provides an opportunity to relieve chronic low back pain and reduce opioid analgesic consumption as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation and permanently implanted neurostimulation systems. Traditionally, the use of neurostimulation earlier in the treatment continuum has been limited by its associated risk, invasiveness, and cost.
methodsPercutaneous PNS leads (SPRINT MicroLead) were placed bilaterally to target the medial branches of the dorsal rami nerves under image guidance. The percutaneous leads were connected to miniature wearable stimulators (SPRINT PNS System) for the 1-month therapy period, after which the leads were removed. Pain and disability were assessed long-term up to 12 months after lead removal.
resultsSubstantial, clinically significant reductions in average pain intensity (≥50% reduction as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form) were experienced by a majority of subjects (67%) at end of treatment compared to baseline (average 80% reduction among responders; P < 0.05, analysis of variance; n = 9). Twelve months after the end of PNS treatment, a majority of subjects who completed the long-term follow-up visits experienced sustained, clinically significant reductions in pain and/or disability (67%, n = 6; average 63% reduction in pain intensity and 32-point reduction in disability among responders). No serious or unanticipated adverse events were reported.
conclusionsThis study challenges the long-held notion that a positive trial of PNS should be followed by a permanent implant in responders. Percutaneous PNS may serve as an effective neurostimulation therapy for patients with chronic low back pain and should be considered earlier in the treatment continuum as a motor-sparing means of avoiding opioids, denervation, and permanently implanted neurostimulation systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.