Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31693555›Full record

ArticleNursing research

Perspectives on Conducting Research in Indian Country.

Emily J Jones, Emily Haozous, Laura S Larsson, Margaret P Moss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Increasing HPV and Cervical Cancer Education Among Native American Communities and Healthcare Providers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Virtual Research with Urban Native Young Women: Cautionary Tales in the Time of a Pandemic.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily J JonesEmily J. Jones, PhD, RNC-OB, is Associate Professor, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston. Emily Haozous, PhD, RN, FAAN, is Senior Research Scientist, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Behavioral Health Research Center of the Southwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Laura S. Larsson, PhD, RN, is Associate Professor, Montana State University, College of Nursing, Bozeman. Margaret P. Moss, PhD, JD, RN, FAAN, is Associate Professor, University of British Columbia, School of Nursing, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Emily Haozous
Laura S Larsson
Margaret P Moss

Funding

Research Core (Developmental Research Project Program)P20GM103474 · NIGMS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI Jeffrey Good · 2012 to 2026
$60.0M
MT INBRE RESEARCH COREP20RR016455 · NCRR · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI HARMSEN, ALLEN G · 2001 to 2011
$34.4M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016455NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCertain research principles, framed within an indigenous context, are helpful guideposts to practice ethical, relevant, and sensitive inquiries. It is essential to further adapt research approaches based on the unique geographical, sociopolitical, and cultural attributes of partnering tribal communities. These adaptations are largely shaped by trial and error.

objectivesThe purpose of this article is to offer the prospective novice nurse researcher lessons that we learned when entering Indian country to conduct research for the first time. As indigenous and nonindigenous researchers, we are not seeking to set down a methodology but rather offer a list of processes, environments, timelines, and barriers that we never learned in didactic, seminar, clinical, practicum, or any other academic setting.

methodsWe organized a set of memories and thoughts through a series of semistructured iterative sessions specific to our first encounters as researchers in Indian country. We compiled our written responses and field notes from our dialogue, interpreted these data, and organized them into themes. We have reported what we felt would be the most surprising, frequent, or important information to note.

resultsWe identified three overarching themes in our collective experience: orientation and negotiation, situating ourselves and our work, and navigating our way. Subthemes included perceiving ourselves as outsiders, negotiating distance and time realities, relying on the goodness of gatekeepers, shaping research questions per community priorities, honing our cross-cultural and intercultural communication skills, discovering the many layers of tribal approval processes, and developing sensibilities and intuition. DISCUSSION: Our previous experiences as novices leading research projects in Indian country have produced unique sensibilities that may serve to guide nurse researchers who seek to partner with tribal communities.

Indexed as

Indians, North AmericanAlaska NativesHealth Services ResearchHumansNursing Research

Identifiers

PMID31693555
PMCPMC6941884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.