Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31693481›Full record

ReviewHeart (British Cardiac Society)2019

Peripartum cardiomyopathy: disease or syndrome?

Lucia Baris, Jérôme Cornette, Mark R Johnson, Karen Sliwa, Jolien W Roos-Hesselink

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pregnancy and cardiovascular disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucia BarisDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jérôme CornetteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark R JohnsonDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetric Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Karen SliwaDepartment of Cardiology, Hatter Institute for Cardiovascular Research in Africa, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jolien W Roos-HesselinkDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a rare form of pregnancy-associated heart failure and is considered to be a diagnosis of exclusion. There are many hypotheses on the aetiology of PPCM; however, the exact pathophysiological mechanism remains unknown. It shows many resemblances to other conditions, such as familial dilated cardiomyopathy or myocarditis, and therefore it can be hard to make a definite diagnosis. We describe four cases of peripartum-onset heart failure in women who were suspected of having PPCM. We discuss the differential diagnosis, pathophysiological mechanisms and various diagnostic modalities.

Indexed as

AdultCardiomyopathiesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHeart FailureHumansPeripartum PeriodPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPrognosisPuerperal DisordersRisk Factorsfamilial cardiomyopathiesheart failureidiopathic dilated cardiomyopathypregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31693481
PMCPMC6613742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.