Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31693452›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2020

Interactions within and between parallel parietal-frontal networks involved in complex motor behaviors in prosimian galagos and a squirrel monkey.

Iwona Stepniewska, Robert M Friedman, Daniel J Miller, Jon H Kaas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Evolution of behavioural control from chordates to primates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Escaping the nocturnal bottleneck, and the evolution of the dorsal and ventral streams of visual processing in primates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iwona StepniewskaDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Robert M FriedmanDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Daniel J MillerDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Jon H KaasDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF THE VISUAL SYSTEMR01EY002686 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI KAAS, JON H · 1985 to 2023
$7.4M
Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MIRNICS, KAROLY · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Structural and functional divisions of the primate pulvinarR01EY025422 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI KAAS, JON H · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002686NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025422NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-train intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of motor (M1) and posterior parietal cortices (PPC) in primates reveals cortical domains for different ethologically relevant behaviors. How functional domains interact with each other in producing motor behaviors is not known. In this study, we tested our hypothesis that matching domains interact to produce a specific complex movement, whereas connections between nonmatching domains are involved in suppression of conflicting motor outputs to prevent competing movements. In anesthetized galagos, we used 500-ms trains of ICMS to evoke complex movements from a functional domain in M1 or PPC while simultaneously stimulating another mismatched or matched domain. We considered movements of different and similar directions evoked from chosen cortical sites distant or close to each other. Their trajectories and speeds were analyzed and compared with those evoked by simultaneous stimulation. Stimulation of two sites evoking same or complementary movements produced a similar but more pronounced movement or a combined movement, respectively. Stimulation of two sites representing movements of different directions resulted in partial or total suppression of one of these movements. Thus interactions between domains in M1 and PPC were additive when they were functionally matched across fields or antagonistic between functionally conflicting domains, especially in PPC, suggesting that mismatched domains are involved in mutual suppression. Simultaneous stimulation of unrelated domains (forelimb and face) produced both movements independently. Movements produced by the simultaneous stimulation of sites in domains of two cerebral hemispheres were largely independent, but some interactions were observed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalElectric StimulationFemaleGalagoMaleMotor CortexMovementNerve NetParietal LobeSaimiricomplex movementsmicrostimulationmotor cortexposterior parietal cortex

Identifiers

PMID31693452
PMCPMC6985852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.