Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31693276›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2020

Prediction of impacts of mutations on protein structure and interactions: SDM, a statistical approach, and mCSM, using machine learning.

Arun Prasad Pandurangan, Tom L Blundell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Analysis of proteins in the light of mutations.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arun Prasad PanduranganDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7168-7143
Tom L BlundellDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2708-8992
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilGates Foundation RG60453Medical Research Council Antimicrobial Resistance / RG77600Medical Research Council MC_UP_1201/14Medical Research Council MR/M026302/1Medical Research Council MR/N501864/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust Investigator Award / 200814/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing methods have not only allowed an understanding of genome sequence variation during the evolution of organisms but have also provided invaluable information about genetic variants in inherited disease and the emergence of resistance to drugs in cancers and infectious disease. A challenge is to distinguish mutations that are drivers of disease or drug resistance, from passengers that are neutral or even selectively advantageous to the organism. This requires an understanding of impacts of missense mutations in gene expression and regulation, and on the disruption of protein function by modulating protein stability or disturbing interactions with proteins, nucleic acids, small molecule ligands, and other biological molecules. Experimental approaches to understanding differences between wild-type and mutant proteins are most accurate but are also time-consuming and costly. Computational tools used to predict the impacts of mutations can provide useful information more quickly. Here, we focus on two widely used structure-based approaches, originally developed in the Blundell lab: site-directed mutator (SDM), a statistical approach to analyze amino acid substitutions, and mutation cutoff scanning matrix (mCSM), which uses graph-based signatures to represent the wild-type structural environment and machine learning to predict the effect of mutations on protein stability. Here, we describe DUET that uses machine learning to combine the two approaches. We discuss briefly the development of mCSM for understanding the impacts of mutations on interfaces with other proteins, nucleic acids, and ligands, and we exemplify the wide application of these approaches to understand human genetic disorders and drug resistance mutations relevant to cancer and mycobacterial infections. STATEMENT FOR A BROADER AUDIENCE: Genetic or somatic changes in genes can lead to mutations in human proteins, which give rise to genetic disorders or cancer, or to genes of pathogens leading to drug resistance. Computer software described here, using statistical approaches or machine learning, uses the information from genome sequencing of humans and pathogens, together with experimental or modeled 3D structures of gene products, the proteins, to predict impacts of mutations in genetic disease, cancer and drug resistance.

Indexed as

MutationComputational BiologyDrug ResistanceGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMachine LearningModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsProtein StabilitySequence Analysis, DNASoftwareProteinsamino acid substitution probabilitiesdrug resistancegenetic disordersmachine learningmutationsprotein stability and interactionsprotein structure

Identifiers

PMID31693276
PMCPMC6933854
OpenAlexW2983394854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.