ArticleJournal of cardiac surgery2019
Hemodynamics of concomitant tricuspid valve procedures at LVAD implantation.
Article in Journal of cardiac surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: a persistent problem.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023Review
- Tricuspid surgery at the time of LVAD implant: A critique.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTricuspid regurgitation (TR) is common in patients receiving left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The current literature is conflicting regarding the effects of concomitant tricuspid valve repair (TVR) at LVAD implantation. We investigated the hemodynamic effects of concomitant TVR at LVAD implantation.
methodsConsecutive clinically stable LVAD outpatients who underwent hemodynamic ramp testings were enrolled in this study, and they were stratified by concomitant TVR. Results of hemodynamic ramp tests were compared between the TVR group and the non-TVR group.
resultsAmong 65 LVAD patients undergoing ramp tests, 34 patients had received TVR, and 31 had not. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between two groups except for higher degree of TR and lower pulmonary artery pulsatility index in the TVR group (P < .05 for both). Following LVAD implantation, the degree of TR improved significantly in the TVR group down to the comparable level with the non-TVR group. During ramp tests, the TVR group had steeper cardiac index slope (0.14 ± 0.12 vs 0.07 ± 0.07 L/min/m
conclusionsConcomitant TVR improves cardiac output and its response to LVAD speed change following LVAD implantation. Longitudinal clinical implications of such hemodynamic changes are unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.