Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31693178›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cellular physiology2020

The landscape of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus immunotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chengdi Wang, Wenliang Qiao, Yuting Jiang, Min Zhu, Jun Shao, Tao Wang, Dan Liu, Weimin Li

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cellular physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. The optimal immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Article
  13. "What really works for us?" exploring therapeutic strategies for non-small cell lung cancer: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chengdi WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5284-2889
Wenliang QiaoDepartment of Lung Cancer Center, Laboratory Lung Cancer, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2099-2188
Yuting JiangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3029-4359
Min ZhuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2605-9791
Jun ShaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9520-9653
Tao WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2072-8309
Dan LiuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6791-1704
Weimin LiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0985-0311
West China Medical Center of Sichuan University · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and the prognosis remains poor. The recent introduction of the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), or plus chemotherapy, both resulted in the survival benefit for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but it remains unanswered which is superior. The current study aimed to estimate the comparative efficacy and safety of ICI-chemotherapy versus ICI-monotherapy in advanced NSCLC.

methodsStudies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that ICI monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy in NSCLC were included with available primary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate, or treatment-related adverse events. A fixed-effect or random-effects model was adopted depending on between-study heterogeneity.

resultsA total of 20 RCTs involving 12,025 patients with NSCLC were included. Both ICI-monotherapy and ICI-chemotherapy resulted in significantly prolonged survival compared to chemotherapy and the former led to significantly longer PFS. The magnitude of survival benefits appeared to be greatest among those treated with pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (OS, 0.56; PFS, 0.54). Additionally, OS and PFS advantages of ICI therapies were observed in patients with NSCLC with low or high programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level, but not in intermediate PD-L1 TPS.

conclusionsPembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy was recommended as the optimal first-line therapy for advanced patients with NSCLC. Additionally, PD-L1 alone is not recommended as an adequate molecular biomarker to identify eligible patients for routine clinical practice in immunotherapy.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsB7-H1 AntigenCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLung NeoplasmsProgression-Free SurvivalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorschemotherapyefficacyimmune checkpoint inhibitornon-small-cell lung cancersafety

Identifiers

PMID31693178
PMCPMC7028135
OpenAlexW2987628800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.