ArticleJAMA network open2019
Attention-Based Deep Neural Networks for Detection of Cancerous and Precancerous Esophagus Tissue on Histopathological Slides.
Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 190 citations in OpenAlex.
- Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in medical imaging: a systematic review of techniques, applications, and challenges.BMC medical imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Towards reliable morphological subtyping and cancer detection on Barrett's esophagus pathology through ensembling foundation models.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Esophageal Precancerous Lesions and Esophageal Cancer.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Review
- Clinical Machine Learning Model for Predicting Pathological Complete Response in Patients with Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma After Trimodality Therapy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- AI in esophageal cancer: advances, barriers to clinical translation, and perspectives for digital health.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening and Risk Assessment through Predictive Modeling on Medical Images and Records.The American journal of pathology · 2026Article
- AI-driven pathology in esophageal cancer: from early screening to precision prognostics.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- A multimodal framework to identify molecular mechanisms driving patient group-associated morphology through the integration of spatial transcriptomics and whole slide imaging.NPJ artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Low-SNR and BER reduction in UWOC systems using DESN and CNN-TCN deep learning models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning for digital pathology: A critical overview of methodological framework.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Review
- AI-Driven Risk Prediction Tool (TSP-9) Informs Risk-Aligned Care for Patients with Barrett's Esophagus.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Predicting targeted therapy resistance in non-small cell lung cancer using multimodal machine learning.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Interactive Explainable Deep Learning Model for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis at Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Diagnostic Study.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Article
- Deep Learning for Classification of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Activity in Whole Slide Images of Colonic Histopathology.The American journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Ethical challenges and evolving strategies in the integration of artificial intelligence into clinical practice.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Nanomedicine and Organ-specific Therapy: An Updated Review.Current drug targets · 2025Review
- Knowledge-Informed Machine Learning for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Review.IEEE transactions on automation science and engineering : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2025Article
- Computational pathology: A survey review and the way forward.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Review
- Scalable deep learning artificial intelligence histopathology slide analysis and validation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A multi-model approach integrating whole-slide imaging and clinicopathologic features to predict breast cancer recurrence risk.NPJ breast cancer · 2024Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Deep learning-based methods, such as the sliding window approach for cropped-image classification and heuristic aggregation for whole-slide inference, for analyzing histological patterns in high-resolution microscopy images have shown promising results. These approaches, however, require a laborious annotation process and are fragmented. Objective: To evaluate a novel deep learning method that uses tissue-level annotations for high-resolution histological image analysis for Barrett esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma detection. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study collected deidentified high-resolution histological images (N = 379) for training a new model composed of a convolutional neural network and a grid-based attention network. Histological images of patients who underwent endoscopic esophagus and gastroesophageal junction mucosal biopsy between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018, at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (Lebanon, New Hampshire) were collected. Main Outcomes and Measures: The model was evaluated on an independent testing set of 123 histological images with 4 classes: normal, BE-no-dysplasia, BE-with-dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma. Performance of this model was measured and compared with that of the current state-of-the-art sliding window approach using the following standard machine learning metrics: accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 score. Results: Of the independent testing set of 123 histological images, 30 (24.4%) were in the BE-no-dysplasia class, 14 (11.4%) in the BE-with-dysplasia class, 21 (17.1%) in the adenocarcinoma class, and 58 (47.2%) in the normal class. Classification accuracies of the proposed model were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.90) for the BE-no-dysplasia class, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.84-0.92) for the BE-with-dysplasia class, and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84-0.92) for the adenocarcinoma class. The proposed model achieved a mean accuracy of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80-0.86) and marginally outperformed the sliding window approach on the same testing set. The F1 scores of the attention-based model were at least 8% higher for each class compared with the sliding window approach: 0.68 (95% CI, 0.61-0.75) vs 0.61 (95% CI, 0.53-0.68) for the normal class, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.80) vs 0.58 (95% CI, 0.45-0.69) for the BE-no-dysplasia class, 0.30 (95% CI, 0.11-0.48) vs 0.22 (95% CI, 0.11-0.33) for the BE-with-dysplasia class, and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.54-0.77) vs 0.58 (95% CI, 0.44-0.70) for the adenocarcinoma class. However, this outperformance was not statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest that the proposed attention-based deep neural network framework for BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma detection is important because it is based solely on tissue-level annotations, unlike existing methods that are based on regions of interest. This new model is expected to open avenues for applying deep learning to digital pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.