Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31693124›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Attention-Based Deep Neural Networks for Detection of Cancerous and Precancerous Esophagus Tissue on Histopathological Slides.

Naofumi Tomita, Behnaz Abdollahi, Jason Wei, Bing Ren, Arief Suriawinata, Saeed Hassanpour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 190 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Artificial Intelligence for Esophageal Precancerous Lesions and Esophageal Cancer.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Knowledge-Informed Machine Learning for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Review.IEEE transactions on automation science and engineering : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naofumi TomitaDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Behnaz AbdollahiDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Jason WeiDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Bing RenDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Arief SuriawinataDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Saeed HassanpourDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Dartmouth College · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · US

Funding

Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening and Risk Assessment through Deep Learning on Medical Images and RecordsR01LM012837 · NLM · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI HASSANPOUR, SAEED · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Deep learning-based methods, such as the sliding window approach for cropped-image classification and heuristic aggregation for whole-slide inference, for analyzing histological patterns in high-resolution microscopy images have shown promising results. These approaches, however, require a laborious annotation process and are fragmented. Objective: To evaluate a novel deep learning method that uses tissue-level annotations for high-resolution histological image analysis for Barrett esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma detection. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study collected deidentified high-resolution histological images (N = 379) for training a new model composed of a convolutional neural network and a grid-based attention network. Histological images of patients who underwent endoscopic esophagus and gastroesophageal junction mucosal biopsy between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018, at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (Lebanon, New Hampshire) were collected. Main Outcomes and Measures: The model was evaluated on an independent testing set of 123 histological images with 4 classes: normal, BE-no-dysplasia, BE-with-dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma. Performance of this model was measured and compared with that of the current state-of-the-art sliding window approach using the following standard machine learning metrics: accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 score. Results: Of the independent testing set of 123 histological images, 30 (24.4%) were in the BE-no-dysplasia class, 14 (11.4%) in the BE-with-dysplasia class, 21 (17.1%) in the adenocarcinoma class, and 58 (47.2%) in the normal class. Classification accuracies of the proposed model were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.90) for the BE-no-dysplasia class, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.84-0.92) for the BE-with-dysplasia class, and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84-0.92) for the adenocarcinoma class. The proposed model achieved a mean accuracy of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80-0.86) and marginally outperformed the sliding window approach on the same testing set. The F1 scores of the attention-based model were at least 8% higher for each class compared with the sliding window approach: 0.68 (95% CI, 0.61-0.75) vs 0.61 (95% CI, 0.53-0.68) for the normal class, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.80) vs 0.58 (95% CI, 0.45-0.69) for the BE-no-dysplasia class, 0.30 (95% CI, 0.11-0.48) vs 0.22 (95% CI, 0.11-0.33) for the BE-with-dysplasia class, and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.54-0.77) vs 0.58 (95% CI, 0.44-0.70) for the adenocarcinoma class. However, this outperformance was not statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest that the proposed attention-based deep neural network framework for BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma detection is important because it is based solely on tissue-level annotations, unlike existing methods that are based on regions of interest. This new model is expected to open avenues for applying deep learning to digital pathology.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusBiopsyComputer SimulationDatasets as TopicEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansMicroscopy

Identifiers

PMID31693124
PMCPMC6865275
OpenAlexW2986668407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.