ArticleJAMA network open2019
Clinicians' Perspectives on Barriers to Discussing Infertility and Fertility Preservation With Young Women With Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes after assisted reproductive technology in women with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2023Pooled it
- An Implementation Model for Oncofertility Support in a Regional Cancer Center without an In-House Reproductive Medicine Unit.The Kobe journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Dreaming Big: Providing American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline Concordant Oncofertility Care for Adolescents and Young Adults.Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2026Article
- Fertility Preservation Needs of Men Undergoing Cancer Treatment: An Explorative Qualitative Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Review
- A 12-year overview of fertility preservation practice in Nordic pediatric oncology centers.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Factors influencing fertility preservation communication and decision support for cancer patients: a qualitative evidence synthesis of healthcare professionals' perspectives.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Combination olaparib and cyclophosphamide cancer therapy exacerbates ovarian reserve depletion in mice with conditional loss ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Future to Hold: Addressing Fertility Preservation Access in Adolescents and Young Adult Cancer Care.JCO oncology practice · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on the reproductive management of young women with breast cancer: A qualitative study based on social-ecological system theory.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Reproductive health considerations for IDH-mutant glioma patients considering IDH inhibitor therapy: A retrospective cohort study.Neuro-oncology practice · 2025Article
- A multidisciplinary evaluation of fertility preservation for oncology patients in Canada The British Columbia perspective.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025Article
- Fertility preservation practices and gastrointestinal oncologist in Europe: a pan-European study.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Guidelines, Counseling Practices, and Fertility Preservation Options for Childhood Cancer Patients in the Nordic-Baltic Region.JCO oncology practice · 2025Article
- Fertility preservation and mental health among cancer patients of reproductive age.Fertility and sterility · 2025Review
- Disparities in referrals to fertility preservation services for a pediatric and adolescent population.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Article
- Are guidelines guiding? A mixed methods study examining the integration of ASCO fertility discussion guidelines in practice among oncologists and adolescents and young adults at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Fertility preservation in young breast cancer patients: A nationwide survey on knowledge, attitudes, and practices among breast surgical healthcare providers in China.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2025Article
- Fertility counseling in early-onset colorectal cancer and the impact of patient characteristics.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Infertility can be a devastating adverse effect of cancer treatment for young women. Fertility preservation may be an important and influential factor in treatment decisions. Despite American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommending discussion around potential infertility with patients, nearly 50% of young women with cancer remain uninformed. Objective: To understand and describe from clinicians' perspectives the barriers to discussing infertility and fertility preservation with young women with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study used purposeful, maximum variation, and snowball sampling strategies to recruit 22 clinicians from cancer centers and community hospitals in 5 Canadian provinces, 5 practice areas, and 12 practice sites. Eligibility criteria included clinicians who regularly treat young women with cancer who might need fertility preservation. Telephone interviews that lasted between 30 to 75 minutes were conducted between May and November 2014 using a semistructured interview guide. Thematic analysis was used to discern the nature of barriers, and the Cabana framework was used to organize and interpret these findings. Analysis was conducted from May 2014 until May 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinician perspectives on what influences their nonadherence to American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines, which recommend discussing fertility preservation with patients. Results: A total of 22 clinicians were interviewed, including 8 medical oncologists, 4 surgical oncologists, 4 fertility specialists, 3 hematology and oncology specialists, and 3 nurse practitioners or clinician nurse specialists. Seventeen clinicians were women and 5 clinicians were men; the median (range) time in practice was 10 (0.67-37) years. Analysis suggested that clinicians' unfamiliarity with infertility risks, fertility preservation technologies, referral processes, and procedures, as well as environmental factors and their perceptions of fertility preservation, influenced their practices regarding fertility discussions. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this qualitative study suggest that the individual and environmental challenges that clinicians experience might negatively affect their willingness and ability to raise fertility-related issues with young women with cancer. Multiple strategies are needed to address these challenges to improve overall care of young women with cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.