Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31692961›Full record

ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2019

Beta-lactam allergy in Chinese patients and factors predicting genuine allergy.

Philip Hei Li, Leonard Quok Chean Siew, Iason Thomas, Timothy J Watts, Kok Loong Ue, Krzysztof Rutkowski, Chak-Sing Lau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Bridging Global Disparities in Drug Allergy Through AI-Assisted Training for Non-Specialists: Findings From the Multinational ADAPT-2 Course.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Penicillin Allergy in China: Consequences of Inappropriate Skin Testing Practices and Policies.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  8. Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) in China: Advancing Awareness, Access, Advocacy and Alliances From the Greater Bay Area to the Global HAE Community.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bibliometric analysis of the trends and evolution in β-lactam allergy research.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philip Hei LiDivision of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Leonard Quok Chean SiewDepartment of Allergy, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Iason ThomasDepartment of Allergy, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Timothy J WattsDepartment of Allergy, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Kok Loong UeDepartment of Allergy, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Krzysztof RutkowskiDepartment of Allergy, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Chak-Sing LauDivision of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBeta-lactams (BL) are the most frequently reported drug allergy, but the vast majority of patients are found not to be genuinely allergic after evaluation. Few studies have investigated the clinical predictors of genuine BL allergy, and the prevalence in hospitalized Chinese patients is unknown.

methodsPatients admitted to a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong (HK) were analyzed to identify the prevalence and factors associated with the presence of BL allergy labels among hospitalized Chinese patients. A combined cohort of patients having completed allergy investigation for suspected BL allergies in the United Kingdom (UK) and HK were analyzed to identify predictors of genuine allergy.

resultsThe prevalence of BL allergy labels in hospitalized HK Chinese was 5%, which was associated with female gender and concomitant non-BL antibiotic allergy labels. The rate of genuine BL allergy patients referred for suspected allergies in the UK and HK cohort was only 14%. History of anaphylaxis and interval of less than a year since the index reaction were independent clinical predictors of genuine BL allergy. The negative predictive value of penicillin skin testing was 90%, confirming the need for drug provocation testing after negative skin testing. There was a high rate of confirmed piperacillin-tazobactam allergy. DISCUSSION: The estimated true prevalence of genuine BL allergy in hospitalized HK Chinese is around 0.5%. This high rate of BL mislabeling highlights the need for comprehensive allergy evaluation and screening. History of anaphylaxis and duration since the index reaction are important predictors of genuine allergy. Piperacillin-tazobactam allergy may pose a unique challenge in this population with a high prevalence of suspected allergies, surging antibiotic resistance, and lack of testing available.

Indexed as

AllergyAntibioticsBeta-lactamsChineseDrugEpidemiologyHypersensitivityPenicillinsPredictorsPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID31692961
PMCPMC6822230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.