Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31692958›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2019

Application of deep learning to the classification of uterine cervical squamous epithelial lesion from colposcopy images.

Yasunari Miyagi, Kazuhiro Takehara, Takahito Miyake

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of gynecologic cancer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yasunari MiyagiMedical Data Labo, Okayama 703-8267, Japan.
Kazuhiro TakeharaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization, Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime 791-0208, Japan.
Takahito MiyakeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Miyake Clinic, Okayama 701-0204, Japan.
Miyake Eye Hospital · JPOkayama Medical Center · JPShikoku Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to explore the feasibility of using deep learning as artificial intelligence (AI) to classify cervical squamous epithelial lesions (SIL) from colposcopy images. A total of 330 patients who underwent colposcopy and biopsy by gynecologic oncologists were enrolled in the current study. A total of 97 patients received a pathological diagnosis of low-grade SIL (LSIL) and 213 of high-grade SIL (HSIL). An original AI-classifier with 11 layers of the convolutional neural network was developed and trained. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and Youden's J index of the AI-classifier and oncologists for diagnosing HSIL were 0.823 and 0.797, 0.800 and 0.831, 0.882 and 0.773, and 0.682 and 0.604, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.826±0.052 (mean ± standard error), and the 95% confidence interval 0.721-0.928. The optimal cut-off point was 0.692. Cohen's Kappa coefficient for AI and colposcopy was 0.437 (P<0.0005). The AI-classifier performed better than oncologists, although not significantly. Although further study is required, the clinical use of AI for the classification of HSIL/LSIL from by colposcopy may be feasible.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecervical cancercervical intraepithelial neoplasiacolposcopydeep learning

Identifiers

PMID31692958
PMCPMC6826263
OpenAlexW2978264737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.