ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2019
SAD phasing of XFEL data depends critically on the error model.
Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural basis of the promiscuity of the unusual Fe(II) and 2-oxoglutarate dependent human aspartate/asparagine-β-hydroxylase.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Robust error calibration for serial crystallography.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2025Article
- Laue-DIALS: Open-source software for polychromatic x-ray diffraction data.Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Laue-DIALS: open-source software for polychromatic X-ray diffraction data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Going around the Kok cycle of the water oxidation reaction with femtosecond X-ray crystallography.IUCrJ · 2023Article
- Non-Canonical Amino Acids in Analyses of Protease Structure and Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Optimal estimated standard uncertainties of reflection intensities for kinematical refinement from 3D electron diffraction data.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2023Article
- Crystal diffraction prediction and partiality estimation using Gaussian basis functions.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2023Article
- Room temperature crystallography and X-ray spectroscopy of metalloenzymes.Methods in enzymology · 2023Article
- Article
- Room temperature XFEL crystallography reveals asymmetry in the vicinity of the two phylloquinones in photosystem I.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Beyond integration: modeling every pixel to obtain better structure factors from stills.IUCrJ · 2020Article
- Evaluating crystallographic likelihood functions using numerical quadratures.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A nonlinear least-squares method for refining a parametric expression describing the estimated errors of reflection intensities in serial crystallographic (SX) data is presented. This approach, which is similar to that used in the rotation method of crystallographic data collection at synchrotrons, propagates error estimates from photon-counting statistics to the merged data. Here, it is demonstrated that the application of this approach to SX data provides better SAD phasing ability, enabling the autobuilding of a protein structure that had previously failed to be built. Estimating the error in the merged reflection intensities requires the understanding and propagation of all of the sources of error arising from the measurements. One type of error, which is well understood, is the counting error introduced when the detector counts X-ray photons. Thus, if other types of random errors (such as readout noise) as well as uncertainties in systematic corrections (such as from X-ray attenuation) are completely understood, they can be propagated along with the counting error, as appropriate. In practice, most software packages propagate as much error as they know how to model and then include error-adjustment terms that scale the error estimates until they explain the variance among the measurements. If this is performed carefully, then during SAD phasing likelihood-based approaches can make optimal use of these error estimates, increasing the chance of a successful structure solution. In serial crystallography, SAD phasing has remained challenging, with the few examples of de novo protein structure solution each requiring many thousands of diffraction patterns. Here, the effects of different methods of treating the error estimates are estimated and it is shown that using a parametric approach that includes terms proportional to the known experimental uncertainty, the reflection intensity and the squared reflection intensity to improve the error estimates can allow SAD phasing even from weak zinc anomalous signal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.