Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31692460›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances2019

Bayesian machine learning improves single-wavelength anomalous diffraction phasing.

Maria Jose Garcia-Bonete, Gergely Katona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Correcting systematic errors in diffraction data with modern scaling algorithms.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Journal of applied crystallography · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria Jose Garcia-BoneteDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Box 462, Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8832-4338
Gergely KatonaDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Box 462, Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2031-8716

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-wavelength X-ray anomalous diffraction (SAD) is a frequently employed technique to solve the phase problem in X-ray crystallography. The precision and accuracy of recovered anomalous differences are crucial for determining the correct phases. Continuous rotation (CR) and inverse-beam geometry (IBG) anomalous data collection methods have been performed on tetragonal lysozyme and monoclinic survivin crystals and analysis carried out of how correlated the pairs of Friedel's reflections are after scaling. A multivariate Bayesian model for estimating anomalous differences was tested, which takes into account the correlation between pairs of intensity observations and incorporates the a priori knowledge about the positivity of intensity. The CR and IBG data collection methods resulted in positive correlation between I(+) and I(-) observations, indicating that the anomalous difference dominates between these observations, rather than different levels of radiation damage. An alternative pairing method based on near simultaneously observed Bijvoet's pairs displayed lower correlation and it was unsuccessful for recovering useful anomalous differences when using the multivariate Bayesian model. In contrast, multivariate Bayesian treatment of Friedel's pairs improved the initial phasing of the two tested crystal systems and the two data collection methods.

Indexed as

Bayesian inferenceBijvoet pairscontinuous rotation data collectionFriedel pairsinverse-beam geometrySADsingle-wavelength X-ray anomalous diffractionsurvivin

Identifiers

PMID31692460
PMCPMC6833979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.