ArticleClinical and translational science2020
A Network Meta-Analysis of Efficacy of Different Interventions in the Prevention of Postoperative Intrauterine Adhesions.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of endometrial perfusion by arrival time parametric imaging using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in patients with intrauterine adhesions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Regenerative capacity of mesenchymal stem cells in the management of Asherman syndrome - a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2025Review
- Article
- Intrauterine infusion of autologous endometrial stem cells for the treatment of moderate and severe intrauterine adhesions: a before-and-after study.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- The application of tissue engineering strategies for uterine regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- The Application of Hydrogels in the Treatment of Intrauterine Adhesions.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Review
- Cyclical endometrial repair and regeneration: Molecular mechanisms, diseases, and therapeutic interventions.MedComm · 2023Review
- Laparo-Endoscopic Single Site Combined With Hysteroscopy to Diagnose and Treat Robert's Uterine Malformation: A Case Report.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Comparison of the Reproductive Outcome Between 2 and 4 mg Daily Doses of Estradiol After Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis-Retrospective Cohort Study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Application of Bioactive Hydrogels for Functional Treatment of Intrauterine Adhesion.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of six interventions, including anti-blocking agents, intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs), estrogens, intrauterine balloon, Foley catheter, and amnion graft for the prevention of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs). We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2016. Cohort studies meeting these six interventions in the prevention of IUAs were included. The combination of direct and indirect evidence was conducted to assess the odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean differences and surface under the cumulative ranking curves of the six interventions in the prevention of postoperative IUAs. Finally, 12 eligible cohort studies were included in this network meta-analysis. The results of this network meta-analysis demonstrated that during 1 to 2 months after operation, compared with the surgical group, anti-blocking agent, and estrogens presented with relatively low ratios of postoperative IUAs (OR = 0.30 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.10-0.67; OR = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.01-0.78, respectively). Compared with IUDs, estrogens exerted comparatively low ratio of postoperative IUAs (OR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.01-0.90), which indicated that anti-blocking agent and estrogens had relatively better prevention efficacy. The cluster analysis showed that estrogens had relatively better efficacy in the prevention postoperative IUAs. Overall, our findings support that estrogens had relatively better efficacy in the prevention of postoperative IUAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.