Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31692258›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics2019

A dyadic genotype-phenotype approach to diagnostic criteria for Proteus syndrome.

Julie C Sapp, Anna Buser, Jasmine Burton-Akright, Kim M Keppler-Noreuil, Leslie G Biesecker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tumour spectrum inJournal of medical genetics · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Characterizing Paratesticular Neoplasms in Proteus Syndrome.The American journal of surgical pathology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Quantification of Proteus syndrome-associated lung disease.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Mosaicism and the taxonomy of human disease.Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Allelic heterogeneity of Proteus syndrome.Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie C SappNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Anna BuserNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jasmine Burton-AkrightNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Kim M Keppler-NoreuilNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-8250-164X
Leslie G BieseckerNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-0197-3811
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Rare & Mosaic Disorders - Clinical ResearchZIAHG200388 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BIESECKER, LESLIE · 2013 to 2025
$17.3M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200388NHGRI NIH HHS HG200388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotype-based diagnostic criteria were developed for Proteus syndrome in 1999 and updated in 2006. Subsequently, the causative mosaic gene alteration was discovered, the c.49G>A p.E17K variant in AKT1. As well, a number of overlapping overgrowth disorders attributable to mosaic PIK3CA variants have now been characterized, leading to the designation of PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS). Finally, ongoing work to better characterize Proteus syndrome has led to identification of additional features of that disorder that could be useful in diagnostic criteria. We have taken the opportunity of these discoveries to re-evaluate the Proteus syndrome diagnostic criteria. Here we propose a new set of diagnostic criteria that establishes a weighted, point-based system for the phenotypic attributes and then integrates that with the potential molecular test results to result in one of two designations: AKT1-related Proteus syndrome or AKT1-related overgrowth spectrum. A patient whose only manifestation is an AKT1 c.49G>A-positive tumor would receive neither of these designations. Here we review the rational basis of diagnostic criteria and argue that a unitary diagnostic entity is a distinct gene-phenotype dyad and that this should be the model for all mendelian disorders. The gene-alone or phenotype-alone approach is inadequate to rigorously delineate a unitary diagnostic entity.

Indexed as

GenotypePhenotypeHumansProteus SyndromeProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktProto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt

Identifiers

PMID31692258
PMCPMC7520016
OpenAlexW2985028625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.