Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31692188›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of neurology2020

Efficacy of galcanezumab in patients with episodic migraine and a history of preventive treatment failure: results from two global randomized clinical trials.

D D Ruff, J H Ford, A Tockhorn-Heidenreich, V L Stauffer, S Govindan, S K Aurora, G M Terwindt, P J Goadsby

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

D D RuffEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
J H FordEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
A Tockhorn-HeidenreichEli Lilly and Company, Erl Wood Manor, Windlesham, UK.
V L StaufferEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
S GovindanEli Lilly Services India Private Limited, Bengaluru, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7272-058X
S K AuroraEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
G M TerwindtLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
P J GoadsbyNIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, King's College London, London, UK.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USEli Lilly (India) · INKing's College London · GBLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

Eli Lilly and Company
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe efficacy of galcanezumab, a monoclonal antibody for migraine prevention, has been demonstrated in two pivotal trials in patients with episodic migraine.

methodsEVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2 were identical phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in patients with episodic migraine. Mean migraine headache days per month at baseline was 9. Patients were randomized 2:1:1 to monthly injections of placebo, galcanezumab 120 mg/240 mg during the 6-month double-blind treatment period. Key efficacy outcomes were assessed in subgroups amongst patients for whom, previously, for efficacy and/or safety/tolerability reasons (i) one or more (≥1) preventives failed, (ii) two or more (≥2) preventives failed and (iii) preventives were never used, or used but not failed (no prior failure).

resultsIn an integrated analysis of EVOLVE studies, galcanezumab 120 mg/240 mg versus placebo led to larger overall mean (SE) reductions in monthly migraine headache days across 6 months in patients with prior preventive failures (P < 0.001): ≥1 failure: 120 mg: -4.0 (0.4); 240 mg: -4.2 (0.5); placebo: -1.3 (0.4); ≥2 failures: 120 mg: -3.1 (0.7); 240 mg: -3.8 (0.8); placebo: -0.5 (0.6). Similar results were observed amongst patients with no prior failure, but the placebo response was larger: 120 mg: -4.7 (0.2); 240 mg: -4.5 (0.2); placebo: -3.0 (0.2) (P < 0.001 versus placebo). Significant improvements were observed with galcanezumab versus placebo for ≥50% and ≥75% reduction in monthly migraine headache days.

conclusionIn patients with episodic migraine treated with galcanezumab, those with ≥1 or ≥2 prior preventive failures had significantly larger improvements, versus placebo, in efficacy outcomes. Similar results were observed in patients with no prior failure, with a larger placebo response.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedgalcanezumabepisodic migrainegalcanezumabLY2951742phase 3preventive failure

Identifiers

PMID31692188
PMCPMC7155018
OpenAlexW2987413935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.