Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31692022›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2020

A utility approach to individualized optimal dose selection using biomarkers.

Pin Li, Jeremy M G Taylor, Spring Kong, Shruti Jolly, Matthew J Schipper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pin LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4508-3762
Jeremy M G TaylorDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Spring KongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Shruti JollyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Matthew J SchipperDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Scott Michael Schuetze · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
TREATMENT VERIFICATION AND TREATMENT PLAN REFINEMENTP01CA059827 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KESSLER, MARC LEWIS, LAWRENCE, THEODORE S · 1993 to 2018
$37.9M
Statistical Methods for Cancer BiomarkersR01CA129102 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GHOSH, DEBASHIS, TAYLOR, JEREMY M.G. · 2009 to 2021
$3.3M
FUNCTIONAL IMAGE AND MOLECULAR MARKER TO INDIVIDUALIZE ADAPTIVE RADIATION DOSE ESR01CA142840 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KONG, FENG-MING P. · 2010 to 2015
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA059827NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129102NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many settings, including oncology, increasing the dose of treatment results in both increased efficacy and toxicity. With the increasing availability of validated biomarkers and prediction models, there is the potential for individualized dosing based on patient specific factors. We consider the setting where there is an existing dataset of patients treated with heterogenous doses and including binary efficacy and toxicity outcomes and patient factors such as clinical features and biomarkers. The goal is to analyze the data to estimate an optimal dose for each (future) patient based on their clinical features and biomarkers. We propose an optimal individualized dose finding rule by maximizing utility functions for individual patients while limiting the rate of toxicity. The utility is defined as a weighted combination of efficacy and toxicity probabilities. This approach maximizes overall efficacy at a prespecified constraint on overall toxicity. We model the binary efficacy and toxicity outcomes using logistic regression with dose, biomarkers and dose-biomarker interactions. To incorporate the large number of potential parameters, we use the LASSO method. We additionally constrain the dose effect to be non-negative for both efficacy and toxicity for all patients. Simulation studies show that the utility approach combined with any of the modeling methods can improve efficacy without increasing toxicity relative to fixed dosing. The proposed methods are illustrated using a dataset of patients with lung cancer treated with radiation therapy.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineBiomarkersBiometryCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansLung NeoplasmsBiomarkersconstrained LASSOefficacy toxicity trade-offoptimal treatment regimepersonalized medicineutility

Identifiers

PMID31692022
PMCPMC9011407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.