ArticleJournal of anatomy2020
Cranial growth in isolated sagittal craniosynostosis compared with normal growth in the first 6 months of age.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- When Virchow's law fails: Crouzon syndrome as a test case for quantitative suture closure-endocranial shape relationships.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- Computational simulation of cranial soft tissue expansion on the cranium during early postnatal growth in humans.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- Exploring shape changes in healthy bone growth through 3D spatiotemporal statistical shape models: A scoping review.Bone reports · 2025Article
- A Novel Approach to Study Cranial Shape in Children with Normal and Sagittal Synostosis: An Application of Geometric Morphometrics.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2025Article
- Allometry of human calvaria bones during development from birth to 8 years of age shows a nonlinear growth pattern.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cranial bone thickness and density anomalies quantified from CT images can identify chronic increased intracranial pressure.Neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Quantitative morphological analysis framework of infant cranial sutures and fontanelles based on CT images.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
- Spring-Assisted Surgery of Unilambdoid Craniosynostosis.The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2024Article
- Facial analytics based on a coordinate extrapolation system (zFACE) for morphometric phenotyping of developing zebrafish.Disease models & mechanisms · 2023Article
- Automated surgical planning in spring-assisted sagittal craniosynostosis correction using finite element analysis and machine learning.PloS one · 2023Article
- Isolated Effects of Bone, Spring and Surgical Parameters on the Surgical Outcome in Spring-Assisted Sagittal Synostosis Correction.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sagittal craniosynostosis (SCS), the most common type of premature perinatal cranial suture fusion, results in abnormal head shape that requires extensive surgery to correct. It is important to find objective and repeatable measures of severity and surgical outcome to examine the effect of timing and technique on different SCS surgeries. The purpose of this study was to develop statistical models of infant (0-6 months old) skull growth in both normative and SCS subjects (prior to surgery). Our goal was to apply these models to the assessment of differences between these two groups in overall post-natal growth patterns and sutural growth rates as a first step to develop methods for predictive models of surgical outcome. We identified 81 patients with isolated, non-syndromic SCS from Seattle Children's Craniofacial Center patient database who had a preoperative CT exam before the age of 6 months. As a control group, we identified 117 CT exams without any craniofacial abnormalities or bone fractures in the same age group. We first created population-level templates from the CT images of the SCS and normal groups. All CT images from both groups, as well as the canonical templates of both cohorts, were annotated with anatomical landmarks, which were used in a growth model that predicted the locations of these landmarks at a given age based on each population. Using the template images and the landmark positions predicted by the growth models, we created 3D meshes for each week of age up to 6 months for both populations. To analyze the growth patterns at the suture sites, we annotated both templates with additional semi-landmarks equally spaced along the metopic, coronal, sagittal and lambdoidal cranial sutures. By transferring these semi-landmarks to meshes produced from the growth model, we measured the displacement of the bone borders and suture closure rates. We found that the growth at the metopic and coronal sutures were more rapid in the SCS cohort than in the normal cohort. The antero-posterior displacement of the semi-landmarks also indicated a more rapid growth in the sagittal plane in the SCS model than in the normal model. Statistical templates and geometric morphometrics are promising tools for understanding the growth patterns in normal and synostotic populations and to produce objective and reproducible measurements of severity and outcome. Our study is the first of its kind to quantify the bone growth for the first 6 months of life in both normal and sagittal synostosis patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.