Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31691957›Full record

ReviewCancer2020

Biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

J Nicholas Bodor, Yanis Boumber, Hossein Borghaei

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 200 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
200citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
20.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

200 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 339 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Beyond the gap: moonlighting functions of connexins in cancer.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Programmed cell death in lung cancer: mechanisms, immune responses, and therapeutics.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

140 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

J Nicholas BodorDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Yanis BoumberDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Hossein BorghaeiDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-2577-4454
Fox Chase Cancer Center · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Targeting Musashi-2 (MSI2) regulation of VEGFR2 / VEGF-A in lung cancerR01CA218802 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI BOUMBER, YANIS · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
Targeting Musashi-2 (MSI2) regulation of EGFR and HER2 in lung cancerR21CA223394 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI MAKHOV, PETR B. · 2018 to 2019
$436k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218802NCI NIH HHS R21 CA223394NIH HHS R01 CA218802NIH HHS R21 CA223394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of immunotherapy has dramatically changed how non-small cell lung cancer is treated, and longer survival is now possible for some patients, even those with advanced disease. Although some patients achieve durable responses to checkpoint blockade, not all experience such benefits, and some suffer from significant immunotoxicities. Given this, biomarkers that predict response to therapy are essential, and testing for tumor programmed death ligand 1(PD-L1) expression is the current standard. The extent of PD-L1 expression determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has demonstrated a correlation with treatment response, although limitations with this marker exist. Recently, tumor mutational burden has emerged as an alternative biomarker, and studies have demonstrated its utility, irrespective of the PD-L1 level of a tumor. Gene expression signatures, tumor genotype (such as the presence of an oncogenic driver mutation), as well as the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment also seem to affect response to immunotherapy and are being researched. Peripheral serum markers are being studied, and some have demonstrated predictive ability, although most are still investigational and need prospective validation. In the current article, the authors review the biomarker PD-L1 as well as other emerging and investigational tissue-based and serum-based markers that have potential to better predict responders to immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDrug MonitoringGene Expression ProfilingHumansImmunohistochemistryLiquid BiopsyLungLung NeoplasmsMutation RateTreatment OutcomeTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanbiomarkersimmunotherapynon-small-cell lung cancerprogrammed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)tumor mutational burden (TMB)

Identifiers

PMID31691957
PMCPMC7372560
OpenAlexW2985170860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.