Observational studyJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2020
Monitoring of low dabigatran concentrations: diagnostic performance at clinically relevant decision thresholds.
Observational study in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid assessment of direct oral anticoagulants in acute stroke-An educational systematic review.European stroke journal · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Intravenous Thrombolysis With Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg in Patients With Ischemic Stroke Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Observational
- Dabigatran in Cerebral Sinus Vein Thrombosis and Thrombophilia.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Intravenous thrombolysis in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (ESO IVT guidelines comment).European stroke journal · 2021Article
- Author Reply to "Intravenous thrombolysis in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (European stroke organisation intravenous thrombolysis guidelines comment).European stroke journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The direct oral anticoagulant dabigatran does not require therapeutic drug monitoring, however emergency measurements are gaining importance. Current assays feature good performance at intermediate and high dabigatran concentrations but show limited accuracy at low concentrations. This area requires more attention as clinical decision threshold values currently lie at 30 and 50 ng/ml. The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare diagnostic performance of dabigatran assays at these thresholds. Dabigatran concentrations of 293 plasma samples taken from 50 patients were measured with the INNOVANCE direct thrombin inhibitor assay (DTI) from Siemens, the Biophen direct thrombin inhibitor assay (BDTI), the BDTI using a low range calibrator (BDTI-low), the Hemoclot direct thrombin inhibitor assay (HTI) and an ecarin clotting time assay (ECT). Assay results were compared to ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS), and test characteristics were calculated for thresholds of 30 and 50 ng/ml. DTI, BDTI-low and ECT showed very strong correlation and high agreement with UPLC-MS/MS and an improved determination of low dabigatran concentrations. ROC curve analyses revealed very high accuracy at the 30/50 ng/ml thresholds for DTI (AUC = 0.989/0.995), BDTI-low (AUC = 0.980/0.991) and ECT (AUC = 0.990/0.996) measurements. Sensitivity and specificity in detecting were calculated for DTI (98/92%), BDTI-low (87/95%), ECT (97/96%), BDTI (99/82%) and HTI (86/89%) measurements. Compared to the previously available HTI and BDTI, both novel assays, DTI and BDTI-low, reliably determine low dabigatran plasma concentrations around the clinical decision thresholds with very high sensitivity and specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.