ArticleParasitology research2019
De novo transcriptome sequencing and differential gene expression analysis of two parasitic human Demodex species.
Article in Parasitology research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Third Generation Genome Sequencing of the Endobacterium Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii subsp. demodicis Reveals Details of Its Microbe-Host-Interaction With the Most Complex Human Commensal, Demodex folliculorum.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026Article
- Reducing ocularFrontiers in allergy · 2025Article
- Modern Technologies inSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2025Review
- Discovery and demonstration of the temperature stress response functions of Dermatophagoides farinae proteins 1 and 2.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Identification and genetic characterisatin of cathepsin L in Demodex.Experimental & applied acarology · 2023Article
- Article
- De novo transcriptome sequencing and functional annotation of Demodex canis.Experimental & applied acarology · 2022Article
- NovelPostepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Demodex are among the tiniest organisms in Acari and are important mammalian parasites. However, differences in pathogenicity between two human parasites, Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis, remain unknown. Related genetic studies are limited by RNA extraction difficulties and molecular data deficiencies. In this study, RNA extraction, de novo sequencing, functional annotation, and differential gene expression analyses were performed to compare D. folliculorum and D. brevis. This yielded 67.09 and 65.10 million clean reads, respectively, with similar annotations. Bioinformatics analyses and manual alignments identified 237 coding sequences comprising 48 genes from 29 families, including five important functional classes. Of these, 30 genes from 20 families related to metabolism, motion, detoxification and stress response, and allergic reaction were differentially expressed between the two species. Cathepsin type 1, serine protease inhibitor, arginine kinase, triosephosphate isomerase, muscle-specific protein 20-2, myosin alkaline light chain, troponin C, tropomyosin, and heat shock protein 90 were highly expressed in D. folliculorum, whereas cathepsin type 2, aspartic protease, serine protease, myosin heavy chain type 2, and alpha tubulin type 1C were highly expressed in D. brevis. Verified coding sequences were nearly consistent with unigene clusters. Further, absolute quantification results demonstrated that differentially expressed genes followed the predicted expression trend. Therefore, the first RNA sequencing and functional annotation analysis of two Demodex species was successful. Differential expression of important functional genes is likely implicated in pathogenicity disparities between these two species. Our study provides molecular data and technical support for further studies on human Demodex pathogenicity and functional genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31691855What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.